EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell in an opinion piece published in a French newspaper on Sunday stressed Taiwan’s importance to Europe and called on European navies to patrol the Taiwan Strait.
Europe should reject Chinese action against Taiwan “because it would be, in economic terms, extremely serious for us, because Taiwan has a strategic role in the production of the most advanced semiconductors,” he said. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken similarly highlighted the importance of Taiwanese semiconductors in September last year when he said that an attack on Taiwan would devastate the global economy.
Of course, it is not only Taiwan’s semiconductors, but also free passage through the Taiwan Strait itself that would be threatened in the event of a Chinese attack on Taiwan. EU officials have said they would sanction China in the event of such an attack, and China would likely blockade the Strait in response to such sanctions. This would have a devastating effect on global trade, as important shipping lanes in the Indo-Pacific region run through the Taiwan Strait. Regional flights might also be put at risk.
European countries are becoming more aware of the importance of protecting Taiwan’s sovereignty. The UK’s HMS Richmond warship passed through the Taiwan Strait in September 2021, with a British official calling it “a powerful demonstration of the UK’s ... commitment to maritime security in the Indo-Pacific region.”
In July last year, then-joint commander of the French Armed Forces in the Asia-Pacific Rear Admiral Jean-Mathieu Rey told a Tahitian newspaper that France would sail through the Taiwan Strait if deemed necessary. China at the time said that it had “sovereign rights” over all of the Strait, which Rey said was “completely wrong,” as the Taiwan Strait is “an international strait.” In December last year, a German Ministry of Foreign Affairs official said that Berlin would redouble efforts to contest China’s sovereignty claims over the Taiwan Strait and continue to assert its position that it is part of international waters.
That Europe’s concerns about the security of Taiwan and the Taiwan Strait are growing is evident in the large number of delegations that have visited Taiwan in the past few months. Finnish and Swiss delegations arrived in Taipei in February, during which Swiss National Councilor Fabian Molina said that “Authoritarianism and war must not prevail.”
Last month, a delegation led by former Kosovar prime minister Avdullah Hoti, a member of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China Policy, met with President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), and in the same week a delegation led by Czech Chamber of Deputies Speaker Marketa Pekarova Adamova also arrived in Taipei. “As a free, democratic country, we support others who are standing behind the same values,” said Adamova, who made the drip despite concerns that it would anger Beijing.
Taipei should do what it can to foster support for Borrell’s proposal that EU navies regularly transit the Taiwan Strait. Beijing’s attempts to normalize its claims over all of the Taiwan Strait cannot be left unchallenged. The government could aim to facilitate such transits by upgrading port facilities, allowing foreign ships to make port-of-call visits. Transits could also be an opportunity for military exchanges, joint drills or intelligence sharing. Taiwan and the EU have shared interests in keeping the Taiwan Strait open and free.
Taiwan has engaged in discussions with the US and countries in Europe on the issue of trade agreements. Increased trade with other democracies is crucial to Taiwan’s efforts to reduce its dependency on the Chinese market. At the same time, Taipei should explore the possibility of security pacts with friendly countries. Doing so will be increasingly important to global economic security as Beijing threatens free passage in the Taiwan Strait.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means