EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell in an opinion piece published in a French newspaper on Sunday stressed Taiwan’s importance to Europe and called on European navies to patrol the Taiwan Strait.
Europe should reject Chinese action against Taiwan “because it would be, in economic terms, extremely serious for us, because Taiwan has a strategic role in the production of the most advanced semiconductors,” he said. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken similarly highlighted the importance of Taiwanese semiconductors in September last year when he said that an attack on Taiwan would devastate the global economy.
Of course, it is not only Taiwan’s semiconductors, but also free passage through the Taiwan Strait itself that would be threatened in the event of a Chinese attack on Taiwan. EU officials have said they would sanction China in the event of such an attack, and China would likely blockade the Strait in response to such sanctions. This would have a devastating effect on global trade, as important shipping lanes in the Indo-Pacific region run through the Taiwan Strait. Regional flights might also be put at risk.
European countries are becoming more aware of the importance of protecting Taiwan’s sovereignty. The UK’s HMS Richmond warship passed through the Taiwan Strait in September 2021, with a British official calling it “a powerful demonstration of the UK’s ... commitment to maritime security in the Indo-Pacific region.”
In July last year, then-joint commander of the French Armed Forces in the Asia-Pacific Rear Admiral Jean-Mathieu Rey told a Tahitian newspaper that France would sail through the Taiwan Strait if deemed necessary. China at the time said that it had “sovereign rights” over all of the Strait, which Rey said was “completely wrong,” as the Taiwan Strait is “an international strait.” In December last year, a German Ministry of Foreign Affairs official said that Berlin would redouble efforts to contest China’s sovereignty claims over the Taiwan Strait and continue to assert its position that it is part of international waters.
That Europe’s concerns about the security of Taiwan and the Taiwan Strait are growing is evident in the large number of delegations that have visited Taiwan in the past few months. Finnish and Swiss delegations arrived in Taipei in February, during which Swiss National Councilor Fabian Molina said that “Authoritarianism and war must not prevail.”
Last month, a delegation led by former Kosovar prime minister Avdullah Hoti, a member of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China Policy, met with President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), and in the same week a delegation led by Czech Chamber of Deputies Speaker Marketa Pekarova Adamova also arrived in Taipei. “As a free, democratic country, we support others who are standing behind the same values,” said Adamova, who made the drip despite concerns that it would anger Beijing.
Taipei should do what it can to foster support for Borrell’s proposal that EU navies regularly transit the Taiwan Strait. Beijing’s attempts to normalize its claims over all of the Taiwan Strait cannot be left unchallenged. The government could aim to facilitate such transits by upgrading port facilities, allowing foreign ships to make port-of-call visits. Transits could also be an opportunity for military exchanges, joint drills or intelligence sharing. Taiwan and the EU have shared interests in keeping the Taiwan Strait open and free.
Taiwan has engaged in discussions with the US and countries in Europe on the issue of trade agreements. Increased trade with other democracies is crucial to Taiwan’s efforts to reduce its dependency on the Chinese market. At the same time, Taipei should explore the possibility of security pacts with friendly countries. Doing so will be increasingly important to global economic security as Beijing threatens free passage in the Taiwan Strait.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then