Under the supervision of the Ministry of National Defense, a military museum is being built in Taipei.
The budget for it has skyrocketed, and some academics have criticized the museum’s historical narrative that considers the Whampoa Military Academy in China as its origin. More of a connection to Taiwan should be made, they said.
The Control Yuan once reviewed the lack of success of the nation’s all-out defense education, showing that the ambiguity of cross-strait relations has led to different opinions on national identity and defense awareness.
The government’s lack of long-term policies has failed to bring all agencies together to promote such education. Civil servants should receive more training in this respect.
OUTDATED
The All-Out Defense Education Act (全民國防教育法) was enacted after the first rotation of ruling parties.
The act was not outlined by the government, but was proposed by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, especially those who were closely affiliated with officials involved in political warfare.
In other words, the act was entangled in a contest between groups that had different perspectives on national identity and weapons procurement.
The draft act was extremely crude, with some of its articles copied from China, and the review process was rushed. After the act was passed and enacted, it became no more than a formality.
The All-Out Defense Education Act must be revised and updated. Two articles relate to the establishment of the military museum.
Article 5 mentions the “protection, promotion and education of national defense artifacts.”
Article 11 says that “historical sites, museums, memorial halls and other cultural sites” should be properly managed to “enhance the collection, studies, interpretation and protection of works for meaningful artifacts of all-out defense education.”
REFORMS
The objective of national defense education is essentially different from the preservation of cultural assets. These two articles must be amended to meet that goal.
Confronted by threats of invasion, it is necessary to enhance the defense knowledge and national awareness of Taiwanese.
The first task is to improve relevant laws as soon as possible.
Jiang Zung-shiang is a lawyer. He holds a master’s degree in law from the National Defense University.
Translated by Emma Liu
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS