Under the supervision of the Ministry of National Defense, a military museum is being built in Taipei.
The budget for it has skyrocketed, and some academics have criticized the museum’s historical narrative that considers the Whampoa Military Academy in China as its origin. More of a connection to Taiwan should be made, they said.
The Control Yuan once reviewed the lack of success of the nation’s all-out defense education, showing that the ambiguity of cross-strait relations has led to different opinions on national identity and defense awareness.
The government’s lack of long-term policies has failed to bring all agencies together to promote such education. Civil servants should receive more training in this respect.
OUTDATED
The All-Out Defense Education Act (全民國防教育法) was enacted after the first rotation of ruling parties.
The act was not outlined by the government, but was proposed by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, especially those who were closely affiliated with officials involved in political warfare.
In other words, the act was entangled in a contest between groups that had different perspectives on national identity and weapons procurement.
The draft act was extremely crude, with some of its articles copied from China, and the review process was rushed. After the act was passed and enacted, it became no more than a formality.
The All-Out Defense Education Act must be revised and updated. Two articles relate to the establishment of the military museum.
Article 5 mentions the “protection, promotion and education of national defense artifacts.”
Article 11 says that “historical sites, museums, memorial halls and other cultural sites” should be properly managed to “enhance the collection, studies, interpretation and protection of works for meaningful artifacts of all-out defense education.”
REFORMS
The objective of national defense education is essentially different from the preservation of cultural assets. These two articles must be amended to meet that goal.
Confronted by threats of invasion, it is necessary to enhance the defense knowledge and national awareness of Taiwanese.
The first task is to improve relevant laws as soon as possible.
Jiang Zung-shiang is a lawyer. He holds a master’s degree in law from the National Defense University.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS