Under the supervision of the Ministry of National Defense, a military museum is being built in Taipei.
The budget for it has skyrocketed, and some academics have criticized the museum’s historical narrative that considers the Whampoa Military Academy in China as its origin. More of a connection to Taiwan should be made, they said.
The Control Yuan once reviewed the lack of success of the nation’s all-out defense education, showing that the ambiguity of cross-strait relations has led to different opinions on national identity and defense awareness.
The government’s lack of long-term policies has failed to bring all agencies together to promote such education. Civil servants should receive more training in this respect.
OUTDATED
The All-Out Defense Education Act (全民國防教育法) was enacted after the first rotation of ruling parties.
The act was not outlined by the government, but was proposed by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, especially those who were closely affiliated with officials involved in political warfare.
In other words, the act was entangled in a contest between groups that had different perspectives on national identity and weapons procurement.
The draft act was extremely crude, with some of its articles copied from China, and the review process was rushed. After the act was passed and enacted, it became no more than a formality.
The All-Out Defense Education Act must be revised and updated. Two articles relate to the establishment of the military museum.
Article 5 mentions the “protection, promotion and education of national defense artifacts.”
Article 11 says that “historical sites, museums, memorial halls and other cultural sites” should be properly managed to “enhance the collection, studies, interpretation and protection of works for meaningful artifacts of all-out defense education.”
REFORMS
The objective of national defense education is essentially different from the preservation of cultural assets. These two articles must be amended to meet that goal.
Confronted by threats of invasion, it is necessary to enhance the defense knowledge and national awareness of Taiwanese.
The first task is to improve relevant laws as soon as possible.
Jiang Zung-shiang is a lawyer. He holds a master’s degree in law from the National Defense University.
Translated by Emma Liu
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS