Under the supervision of the Ministry of National Defense, a military museum is being built in Taipei.
The budget for it has skyrocketed, and some academics have criticized the museum’s historical narrative that considers the Whampoa Military Academy in China as its origin. More of a connection to Taiwan should be made, they said.
The Control Yuan once reviewed the lack of success of the nation’s all-out defense education, showing that the ambiguity of cross-strait relations has led to different opinions on national identity and defense awareness.
The government’s lack of long-term policies has failed to bring all agencies together to promote such education. Civil servants should receive more training in this respect.
OUTDATED
The All-Out Defense Education Act (全民國防教育法) was enacted after the first rotation of ruling parties.
The act was not outlined by the government, but was proposed by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, especially those who were closely affiliated with officials involved in political warfare.
In other words, the act was entangled in a contest between groups that had different perspectives on national identity and weapons procurement.
The draft act was extremely crude, with some of its articles copied from China, and the review process was rushed. After the act was passed and enacted, it became no more than a formality.
The All-Out Defense Education Act must be revised and updated. Two articles relate to the establishment of the military museum.
Article 5 mentions the “protection, promotion and education of national defense artifacts.”
Article 11 says that “historical sites, museums, memorial halls and other cultural sites” should be properly managed to “enhance the collection, studies, interpretation and protection of works for meaningful artifacts of all-out defense education.”
REFORMS
The objective of national defense education is essentially different from the preservation of cultural assets. These two articles must be amended to meet that goal.
Confronted by threats of invasion, it is necessary to enhance the defense knowledge and national awareness of Taiwanese.
The first task is to improve relevant laws as soon as possible.
Jiang Zung-shiang is a lawyer. He holds a master’s degree in law from the National Defense University.
Translated by Emma Liu
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have twice blocked President William Lai’s (賴清德) special defense budget bill in the Procedure Committee, preventing it from entering discussion or review. Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) proposed amendments that would enable lawmakers to use budgets for their assistants at their own discretion — with no requirement for receipts, staff registers, upper or lower headcount limits, or usage restrictions — prompting protest from legislative assistants. After the new legislature convened in February, the KMT joined forces with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and, leveraging their slim majority, introduced bills that undermine the Constitution, disrupt constitutional
RSS