Former Examination Yuan president John Kuan (關中) has published a book saying that the US has entered a state of decline, and advising Taiwan not to rely entirely on Washington. He also says China is certain to become more powerful and Taiwan should not go against such an irreversible trend.
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) has also suggested that Taiwan should avoid taking sides in the competition between the US and China.
However, Kuan and Gou have failed to respond to the most significant question: If the rise of China is irreversible, why would China let Taiwan survive? If Taiwan refuses to take sides, what would happen if China invades Taiwan? Without taking sides, why should the US assist Taiwan? If they put themselves in Taiwan’s shoes, they would agree that the nation must be prepared for a war, while consolidating its relationships with its allies.
Kuan is an established academic in the field of international relations. His book investigates the wars waged by the US and offers a theory based on solid methods. Regrettably, his historical view falsely affects his conclusion. Two of the most significant wars for the US are the Korean War and the Vietnam War. Kuan believes that the Korean War caused a division between Taiwan and China, but the truth is that without that conflict, then-US secretary of state Dean Acheson would have simply waited “for the dust to settle” in the Chinese Civil War.
However, when North Korea invaded the South, Acheson advised then-US president Harry Truman to send the Seventh Fleet into the Taiwan Strait to neutralize the area to prevent a Chinese invasion. This move was crucial for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to settle itself in Taiwan.
The Vietnam War greatly harmed the US, but Washington has learned its lesson. In principle, the US would no longer send ground forces to intervene in other countries’ civil wars, especially to countries unwilling to fight against their enemies.
Kuan says that it does not make sense for the US to curb the rise of China.
However, according to distinguished figures in the field of international relations, such as John Mearsheimer and Graham Allison, it is only natural for a hegemonic country to be upset by the rise of another powerful country that might threaten its own status. This is precisely what “Thucydides’ Trap” means: namely, the rise of a strong nation leads to wars. If a country tries to change the balance of power, conflict occurs. Japan and Germany disrupted the regional orders in Asia and Europe respectively during World War II, and their actions backfired.
The US is far from perfect.
However, soon after its establishment as a country in 1776, it placed itself in the geopolitical center of the world. The key to the US’ success is its willingness to reflect on its past, including its role in the Vietnam War.
Therefore, if a Chinese invasion occurs, with some Taiwanese advocating “reunification,” peace talks or even surrender, the US would have to stand by and watch based on its reflection on the Vietnam War.
However, if Taiwan insists that democracy should not be destroyed by an authoritarian power, Washington could offer some assistance, even though it might not send its forces to Taiwan.
What Taiwan needs is to be more aware of its own security. The nation needs to view its enemies correctly. When it is clear that there is a lack of safety in the Taiwan Strait, any talk of peace is only empty words that would eventually lead to Taiwan’s destruction.
Michael Lin holds a master’s degree from National Taiwan University’s Graduate Institute of National Development.
Translated by Emma Liu
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS