Former Examination Yuan president John Kuan (關中) has published a book saying that the US has entered a state of decline, and advising Taiwan not to rely entirely on Washington. He also says China is certain to become more powerful and Taiwan should not go against such an irreversible trend.
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) has also suggested that Taiwan should avoid taking sides in the competition between the US and China.
However, Kuan and Gou have failed to respond to the most significant question: If the rise of China is irreversible, why would China let Taiwan survive? If Taiwan refuses to take sides, what would happen if China invades Taiwan? Without taking sides, why should the US assist Taiwan? If they put themselves in Taiwan’s shoes, they would agree that the nation must be prepared for a war, while consolidating its relationships with its allies.
Kuan is an established academic in the field of international relations. His book investigates the wars waged by the US and offers a theory based on solid methods. Regrettably, his historical view falsely affects his conclusion. Two of the most significant wars for the US are the Korean War and the Vietnam War. Kuan believes that the Korean War caused a division between Taiwan and China, but the truth is that without that conflict, then-US secretary of state Dean Acheson would have simply waited “for the dust to settle” in the Chinese Civil War.
However, when North Korea invaded the South, Acheson advised then-US president Harry Truman to send the Seventh Fleet into the Taiwan Strait to neutralize the area to prevent a Chinese invasion. This move was crucial for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to settle itself in Taiwan.
The Vietnam War greatly harmed the US, but Washington has learned its lesson. In principle, the US would no longer send ground forces to intervene in other countries’ civil wars, especially to countries unwilling to fight against their enemies.
Kuan says that it does not make sense for the US to curb the rise of China.
However, according to distinguished figures in the field of international relations, such as John Mearsheimer and Graham Allison, it is only natural for a hegemonic country to be upset by the rise of another powerful country that might threaten its own status. This is precisely what “Thucydides’ Trap” means: namely, the rise of a strong nation leads to wars. If a country tries to change the balance of power, conflict occurs. Japan and Germany disrupted the regional orders in Asia and Europe respectively during World War II, and their actions backfired.
The US is far from perfect.
However, soon after its establishment as a country in 1776, it placed itself in the geopolitical center of the world. The key to the US’ success is its willingness to reflect on its past, including its role in the Vietnam War.
Therefore, if a Chinese invasion occurs, with some Taiwanese advocating “reunification,” peace talks or even surrender, the US would have to stand by and watch based on its reflection on the Vietnam War.
However, if Taiwan insists that democracy should not be destroyed by an authoritarian power, Washington could offer some assistance, even though it might not send its forces to Taiwan.
What Taiwan needs is to be more aware of its own security. The nation needs to view its enemies correctly. When it is clear that there is a lack of safety in the Taiwan Strait, any talk of peace is only empty words that would eventually lead to Taiwan’s destruction.
Michael Lin holds a master’s degree from National Taiwan University’s Graduate Institute of National Development.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS