The ChatGPT artificial intelligence (AI) tool unveiled by OpenAI in November last year has kicked up a flurry of interest around the world, and Taiwan is no exception.
Such tools are likely to change many aspects of people’s lives, from the workplace and healthcare to home living. The question is, do they bring more good than bad to people, or vice versa?
AI refers to the ability of a computer to mimic the capabilities of the human mind, including learning and perceiving, as well as solving problems and comprehending natural languages. It entails the potential of computers to perform the same tasks as humans, or even outperform human intelligence, backed by technological improvements and enhancements in data analytics.
Even as early as a few years ago, there were no signs when the “AI era” would start in earnest, but today ChatGPT makes AI truly tangible for everyone for the first time. While the likes of ChatGPT are not yet perfect, what matters is the progress and direction of human-like machine intelligence development. Indeed, OpenAI’s speech and text-based chatbot is attracting huge interest from various industries, with firms rushing to integrate the technology into their products, including those in the financial industry.
AI technology can help the financial industry in many areas, including customer service, marketing, automation, investment advice, fraud detection and risk management.
However, it could also help criminals pose greater threats to financial institutions, including through data leaks and privacy breaches, the Financial Supervisory Commission said last week. The regulator asked local banks and financial service providers to closely monitor their use of AI tools to ensure data security. It told lawmakers on the legislature’s Finance Committee that it plans to issue guidelines for the responsible use of AI by local financial institutions in August at the earliest.
After Singapore last year set up “fairness, ethics, accountability and transparency” principles for the use of AI in its financial industry, the commission said it would also establish principles for local financial institutions to follow. That is, if financial institutions want to adopt AI tools in their business operations, they must have the capacity to control the technology and determine the level of tolerable risk. They would also be held accountable for any mishaps.
The Securities and Futures Bureau has proposed tighter supervision of AI-powered investment consulting services offered by local securities companies, after excitement over so-called robo-advisers fueled a surge in business over the past year: The number of clients grew 17 percent annually to 167,000 in the first quarter of this year, while assets managed by robo-advisory programs rose 42 percent year-on-year to NT$6.9 billion (US$225.33 million).
The commission seems to have no intention of drafting special legislation to regulate the use of AI in the financial sector for the time being. Instead, it is focusing on establishing a self-regulating mechanism for service providers that enables financial institutions to monitor their own legal, ethical and security standards.
Even though the commission has adopted a hands-off approach on this issue, it should still guide financial institutions in establishing robust protection mechanisms against possible harm from the use of AI. In the meantime, it must consider whether it would eventually take the reins to keep up with international trends and the financial industry’s demands.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS