New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), who is widely expected to become the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, said on Friday in Singapore that “peace is the only option” for cross-strait relations, and practical communication is needed to reduce misunderstandings and seek the “common good” for both sides of the Taiwan Strait and the whole world.
Chinese-language media were quck to notice Hou’s remarks during his trip, which was announced on Monday and began on Wednesday, as it was his first attempt to reveal his stance on cross-strait relations — an important factor influencing presidential elections — and a “gesture” to officially enter the presidential race.
However, when asked if the so-called “1992 consensus” is the foundation of the “common good” for both sides of the Strait, Hou said the main premise is built on “fair, dignified, friendly and practical communications with each other,” without elaborating.
Earlier this month, when asked to clarify what he meant when he said he “respects the spirit of the 1992 consensus,” he said: “Safeguarding the Republic of China’s (ROC) democracy, freedom and sovereignty, and protecting the people’s safety, is everyone’s wish,” and “everyone should build the largest consensus and use the greatest strength to let the ROC peacefully and prosperously go on forever.”
Hou had been considered the front-runner in the KMT’s presidential nomination race, as he had high approval ratings and was re-elected as mayor in a landslide victory last year, but his ratings dropped this year, as he failed to take a stand on important issues such as cross-strait relations, foreign policy and national defense.
Meanwhile, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), a former Taipei mayor and potential presidential candidate for next year’s election, also spoke about his stance on cross-strait relations during his 20-day visit to the US.
Before his trip, Ko told Japanese news magazine Nikkei Asia that “Taiwan and China have a lot in common in terms of culture, religion and history, and more collaboration can be explored between the two economies,” but “when it comes to the political level, I’m sorry, at this stage ‘one China’ is impossible.”
Ko on Thursday told an audience at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington that he believes Taiwan needs to be prepared for war and enhance national defense capabilities to deter it, but must also try to reduce mutual hostility by increasing goodwill through communication.
He said the TPP hopes for peace, but “Taiwan’s self-determination” is the bottom line, so “if you [China] step over the line, then I will have to fight back,” adding that the “1992 consensus” is a stigmatized term in Taiwan, so further communication would be difficult if Beijing continues to insist on its use.
In contrast to Hou’s dodging of sensitive issues, Ko has often expressed opinions on issues beyond his role, and his often controversial remarks have given him the reputation of being inconsistent and unpredictable.
While Hou was slightly more outspoken in Singapore, his remarks were vague and bureaucratic, and he was unable to explain his vision for the nation or whether his approach to achieve peace includes embracing the “1992 consensus.” Although Ko made his stance clearer than in his visit to the US in 2019, he failed to explain how his party would improve cross-strait relations without accepting or rejecting the “1992 consensus.”
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS