A statue of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) mounted on a horse was erected in Yilan County’s Suao Township (蘇澳) in 1982. The 7m-tall bronze statue weighs about 500kg, the largest Chiang statue in Yilan.
As the statue has been regarded as a symbol of authoritarianism, it was pulled down by vandals in 2005. Then-Suao mayor Lee Kun-shan (李坤山) had it remounted, but the statue was spray-painted and vandalized further after Lee’s son, Lee Ming-che (李明哲), was elected the town’s new mayor in 2019.
Before long, Lee Ming-che ordered the removal of the statue in an effort to contribute to transitional justice. The statue on Tuesday was relocated to Cihu Mausoleum in Taoyuan’s Dasi District (大溪).
Chiang was undoubtedly an authoritarian and despotic ruler. Although he made some contribution toward Taiwan’s infrastructure, he is identified as having orchestrated the 228 Incident. Under martial law, Chiang abused his power and inflicted state violence on numerous people.
It is natural that he is viewed negatively. Far from casting a positive figure, statues of Chiang should not be displayed in the public sphere.
Hence, the foremost task for transitional justice should be the removal of Chiang statues from all official agencies, schools and public buildings. Regrettably, many institutions have exhibited ostrich-like behavior — especially those under the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Education — avoiding the task on a variety of pretexts.
Without government enforcement, transitional justice in Taiwan would stagnate.
Lee Ming-che has established an example for others to follow. He proposed the statue’s removal, and the public sphere was returned to the people. The bronze statue has been placed where it should be.
The mayor’s proposal did not cause any controversy or meet resistance, indicating that his way of undertaking such tasks are publicly supported. His action should be applauded, and other officials should follow suit.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS