A statue of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) mounted on a horse was erected in Yilan County’s Suao Township (蘇澳) in 1982. The 7m-tall bronze statue weighs about 500kg, the largest Chiang statue in Yilan.
As the statue has been regarded as a symbol of authoritarianism, it was pulled down by vandals in 2005. Then-Suao mayor Lee Kun-shan (李坤山) had it remounted, but the statue was spray-painted and vandalized further after Lee’s son, Lee Ming-che (李明哲), was elected the town’s new mayor in 2019.
Before long, Lee Ming-che ordered the removal of the statue in an effort to contribute to transitional justice. The statue on Tuesday was relocated to Cihu Mausoleum in Taoyuan’s Dasi District (大溪).
Chiang was undoubtedly an authoritarian and despotic ruler. Although he made some contribution toward Taiwan’s infrastructure, he is identified as having orchestrated the 228 Incident. Under martial law, Chiang abused his power and inflicted state violence on numerous people.
It is natural that he is viewed negatively. Far from casting a positive figure, statues of Chiang should not be displayed in the public sphere.
Hence, the foremost task for transitional justice should be the removal of Chiang statues from all official agencies, schools and public buildings. Regrettably, many institutions have exhibited ostrich-like behavior — especially those under the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Education — avoiding the task on a variety of pretexts.
Without government enforcement, transitional justice in Taiwan would stagnate.
Lee Ming-che has established an example for others to follow. He proposed the statue’s removal, and the public sphere was returned to the people. The bronze statue has been placed where it should be.
The mayor’s proposal did not cause any controversy or meet resistance, indicating that his way of undertaking such tasks are publicly supported. His action should be applauded, and other officials should follow suit.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS