The Bamboo Union’s (竹聯幫) Ming-ren Division (明仁會) on March 7 held a high-profile banquet to show off its financial clout in what was a recruitment drive for the organized crime outfit. The event received significant media coverage, sending confusing messages to the public about social values, and making the work of law enforcers more difficult.
After the banquet, the National Police Agency cracked down on criminal activities with a special task force against organized crime and implemented “third-party policing” to root out suspected offenders.
The nature and activities of crime groups have changed. From aggressive debt collection, operating entertainment venues and involving themselves in land development projects, these groups have shifted their focus to large-scale fraud, cross-border money laundering, online gambling and the drug trade.
Cross-border crime is more lucrative and harder to detect, and gangs organize events to brazenly recruit members. Law enforcement needs to adapt to their methods.
Article 11 of the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime says that countries “shall endeavor to ensure that any discretionary legal powers under its domestic law relating to the prosecution of [offenders] are exercised to maximize the effectiveness of law enforcement measures in respect of those offences.”
That is, crackdowns on gangsters need to hurt criminals to be effective.
Based on my research into organized crime, forcing criminals to work without pay would be a more threatening prospect than being imprisoned.
Even though Judicial Yuan Constitutional Interpretation No. 812 states that “forced labor” contravenes Article 8 of the Constitution on protecting personal freedom, it could be a feasible system if the principle of proportionality and the principle of explicit distinctions in the Constitution are adopted.
Legislation to reintroduce a system that is similar to “compulsory vocational training” should again be considered.
Telecommunications fraud and online gambling have become new sources of funding for organized crime. Only scientific and technological investigations can effectively cut the source of these financial flows.
However, Taiwan has no legal basis for such investigations to adhere to the UN convention so that it can take measures “for the use of other special investigative techniques, such as electronic or other forms of surveillance and undercover operations, by its competent authorities in its territory for the purpose of effectively combating organized crime.”
The Legislative Yuan should consider adding provisions to the Organized Crime Prevention Act (組織犯罪防制條例) to allow the use of location tracking technology and source telecommunications surveillance.
Finally, in response to the high-profile and controversial Bamboo Union banquet, legislation should be adopted based on the principle of “administration first, then justice,” in which the use of language, actions or other methods can be interpreted as indicative of membership in a criminal organization.
That is, behaviors linked with criminal organizations or their members should be considered grounds to punish these arrogant offenders.
That would include gatherings of three or more people in public places at events such as spring banquets or funerals where a criminal organization is able to flaunt its influence and disturb public order, cause anxiety or fear among the public. It would also include failure to disband after authorities have ordered them do so on more than three occasions.
Hsu Fu-seng is a professor and director of Central Police University’s Department of Administration Police.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS