Before attending a three-day G7 summit in Hiroshima, Japan, which concluded on Tuesday, German Minister for Foreign Affairs Annalena Baerbock visited China and South Korea.
While in China, she co-chaired with Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Qin Gang (秦剛) the sixth round of the China-Germany Strategic Dialogue on Diplomacy and Security, and met with his predecessor, Chinese Central Foreign Affairs Commission Director Wang Yi (王毅).
Baerbock is clearly a hardliner toward China. As a former deputy chair of the German Bundestag’s Berlin-Taipei Parliamentary Circle of Friends, she is not unfamiliar with Taiwan affairs.
She takes a firm stand on human rights issues, especially those concerning Xinjiang and Hong Kong. During her meetings with Chinese leaders, she did not hold back from talking about China’s human rights environment, and she warned China against making any unilateral change to the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait.
Baerbock’s visit to China was not expected to produce any substantial benefit. Her main purpose was to warn China to be cautious in its handling of Taiwan. Her statements came as a slap in the face to French President Emmanuel Macron after he said that Europeans should not be “followers” of either the US or China with regard to Taiwan.
Baerbock said in China that tensions around Taiwan directly affect European and global economies, and reiterated that the EU’s position on Taiwan has been consistent and unchanged, adding that Taiwan is a reliable Asian partner for the EU and shares common societal values.
Wang told Baerbock that China had supported the reunification of East and West Germany, and that Germany should likewise support China in achieving a “peaceful reunification” with Taiwan. He even said that Taiwan’s “return” to China was an important part of the post-World War II international order.
Beijing insists that issues regarding Taiwan’s governance are “China’s internal affairs” and it does not tolerate interference by “foreign forces.” Wang said that “Taiwan independence forces” were the real cause of cross-strait tensions.
These statements show that China’s stance regarding Taiwan is completely at odds with that of the free world. Along with other factors such as China’s past “wolf warrior” diplomacy and its attitude toward Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, they give the EU reason to doubt that China is willing to uphold the international order. Its behavior is limiting the scope for preserving the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait.
Baerbock made her position clear. While saying that any military escalation by China would be unacceptable, she added that Germany has no interest in economic decoupling.
However, she said that Germany should learn lessons from its reliance on Russian energy resources and reduce the risk of unilateral dependencies. These are close to the views of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who received a cool reception from China when she accompanied Macron on his visit from April 5 to 7.
Baerbock’s statements were doubtlessly meant to signal to China that playing the economic and trade market card no longer works. They also show that Germany and the EU are prepared for greater economic decoupling from China.
For Germany, the most important element of the Chinese market is automobile manufacturing, but that industry also depends on semiconductors manufactured in Taiwan. Furthermore, the Taiwan Strait is an important international shipping route, so Germany and the EU naturally want to reduce geopolitical risks.
Whether China’s relations with Germany continue as a partner, competitor or systemic rival depends on which path China chooses.
Germany’s attitude has changed from the era of former German chancellor Angela Merkel. Baerbock’s China visit could be interpreted as a message to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that Germany would not take the side of the invader.
Hong Tsun-ming, who is originally from Hong Kong, is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
RSS