In October 2015, the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Standing Committee passed a proposal endorsed by a majority of committee members calling for then-deputy legislative speaker Hung Hsiu-chu’s (洪秀柱) presidential nomination to be revoked.
The KMT recently indicated that New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) would be “pre-arranged” as the party’s candidate for next year’s presidential election.
Judging from the precedent set over Hung’s treatment, Hou is likely to be chosen only to weather unpredictable changes in Taiwan’s political climate.
The “prearrangement” means the nomination process has not been completed.
Unlike Hung, Hou’s candidacy is far from certain. As he is only “prearranged” and not nominated, the KMT could just replace him at any moment.
Hou is similar to former KMT legislator Wang Jin-pyng (王金平). Both behave in a modest, low-key style. They are good at diplomacy and do not make enemies easily. This is why the pan-blue camp suspects that their “blueness” is only skin-deep.
Wang’s political career was cut short by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), while Hou is not regarded well by KMT members.
From an outsider’s viewpoint, it is incredible that Hou’s experiences and insight have been attacked by lower-ranked KMT politicians, given that Taiwanese try their best not to offend others.
Hou declared that he would “get the work done with both feet on the ground,” and that in a democracy like Taiwan, “people are more concerned about living and working in peace and security.”
He is not wrong, but his remarks are empty. For a presidential candidate, it is not enough to simply “get the work done.” That is only the minimum requirement for an average person.
Who does not want to live and work in peace and security? According to Confucius’ (孔子) The Analects, the ideal world as depicted in the “Chapter on Great Harmony” would be a small-scale paradise, which is far from realistic and can hardly be realized in the modern world.
In Taiwan’s case, somebody has been trying to confiscate democracy and make people’s lives much harder.
Democratic states such as the UK and the US have been established for centuries, but still need to work hard to defend their democratic systems. The duties of national leaders should not be limited to boosting the economy, which is only one of many ways to serve a nation.
Hou and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) are two sides of the same KMT coin. Although Hou keeps a low profile while Gou is much more flamboyant, they both emphasize that democracy does not put food on the table. They want to ensure that people can live “a good life,” although they do not define what that means.
In the face of China’s threats to democracy and “a good life,” neither Hou nor Gou has offered any solutions. They lack a national vision, which every president needs.
Being a president is entirely different from running a company. It is not like doing business and ensuring that everyone involved makes a profit. Neither is it like being a chief who can do whatever they see fit.
Without a national vision, a presidential candidate can only present baseless claims, saying that they can do everything while urging everyone to trust them.
Such a candidate is a fraud — like a salesperson who wants people to believe that their elixir can cure every illness.
James Wang is a senior journalist.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS