Student discipline
Recently, the head of the student guidance department at a high school in Kaohsiung noticed three students in a class with their backs to the teacher playing on their smartphones.
With the teacher’s permission, the department head entered the classroom and asked the students to produce their phones. They hid them in a drawer and placed their jackets on the drawer.
The department head then asked them to remove the jackets, but the students refused, so the department head stepped in, removed the jackets and told the students to hand over the phones, confiscating them until the end of the school day.
This is a daily occurrence in many schools, but because the students reported the incident to the Taiwan Youth Association for Democracy, accusing the school of illegally searching their personal effects, the incident has caused a bit of a stink.
The Kaohsiung Education Bureau said that the school should have recorded the whole process of the safety check, in accordance with regulations, to protect the rights of both parties.
That sounds great, but are teachers expected to go online and refer to the safety check guidelines every time something happens in the classroom?
Ministry of Education guidelines say that safety checks can be conducted when there is reason to believe students are breaking regulations or are in possession of prohibited items, but there must be either two or more parents’ associations representatives, student associations cadres or teachers present for a search of students’ personal effects or personal space to be conducted, and the entire process is to be recorded by the school’s student affairs department.
Are mobile phones prohibited items and how is the teacher supposed to find representatives during class time?
While the bureau appears to be fair in the matter, the process is a blow to teacher morale.
Discussing this matter with colleagues, some just shook their heads and sighed; one said they had no idea that they were “breaking the law” on a daily basis; and another said they had given up, and if that is the way students wanted to behave, they would be in for a shock when they went out into the big, wide world.
When teachers are “damned if they do, damned if they don’t” in situations when students need to be disciplined, it might be better to recruit teachers on a “see no evil, hear no evil, discipline no evil” basis.
Li Yu-chang
Kaohsiung
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
RSS