Nowhere is the impact of recent crises — the lingering economic consequences of COVID-19 and the global spillover effects of Russia’s war in Ukraine — being felt more acutely than in the developing world. People in poor countries are struggling to cope with higher food and fuel prices, and unsustainable debt, while schoolchildren are still suffering from learning loss caused by the pandemic. In many places, economic growth has stalled.
Compounding these challenges, the effects of climate change are becoming even more pronounced, with floods, droughts and crop failures threatening lives and livelihoods. As the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warned in its most recent report, the world must act immediately to ward off some of the more catastrophic consequences of global warming, which would hit the poorest and most vulnerable the hardest.
The global “polycrisis” poses an unprecedented threat to economic development. Creating a more resilient, sustainable and prosperous future for all now requires redefining the fundamentals of growth to address new transnational threats. Responsiveness, innovation, international cooperation and private-sector partnerships matter more than ever. The World Bank, already the largest provider of finance for climate action in developing countries, is strengthening its operating model to respond rapidly to these changed circumstances.
When assessing low-income countries’ prospects, the numbers speak for themselves. In developing economies, growth over the remainder of this decade is projected to be one-third lower than it was in the 2000s. Recent crises have thrown tens of millions of people back into poverty. Instead of meeting the UN Sustainable Development Goal of ending extreme poverty by 2030, the current rate of progress implies that nearly 600 million people would still be living on less than US$2.15 a day. The longer-term picture is equally bleak: COVID-19-related education shocks could cost today’s students in low and middle-income countries up to 10 percent of their future earnings.
To reverse the losses of recent years and get developing countries back on track, we need to help governments achieve macroeconomic stability and develop business environments that are conducive to private-sector investment.
Rolling out investment-ready capital projects that would underpin a more sustainable future, including in renewable energy and climate-resilient infrastructure, is also essential. Support for building strong and adaptive public health, education and social welfare systems is needed to mitigate the impact of future crises.
The past three years have demonstrated the importance of scaling up crisis preparedness and improving response times. The World Bank Group has provided a financing package of US$170 billion for the 15 months ending in June to help countries address the effects of multiple overlapping crises.
Critically, this has included support for strengthening social protection systems, and food and nutrition security in some of the world’s most vulnerable countries. Since February last year, the World Bank has mobilized more than US$23 billion in financial support for Ukraine.
Targeted funds also play a crucial role in mitigating future disasters. The World Bank’s new Pandemic Fund, for example, would help low and middle-income countries boost capacity in essential areas like disease surveillance, laboratories, the public health workforce and community engagement, as well as emergency communication, coordination and management.
Challenges that are fundamentally transnational or global in nature — particularly climate change — are driving the biggest shifts in development policy. Besides greater resources, progress would require fostering a knowledge-sharing culture, so that countries can quickly learn from one another and make better decisions under conditions of great uncertainty. Careful planning is also needed to ensure that projects would strengthen long-term resilience and are scalable through private-sector investment.
Tackling global warming might seem daunting, but the recent IPCC report offers some hope. It notes that several mitigation technologies — especially those focused on improved land use and renewable energy — have become cost effective in recent years.
Moreover, policies to accelerate the uptake of these technologies, reduce deforestation and improve energy efficiency have led to significant reductions in greenhouse-gas emissions in some sectors. With international support, such advances could be a boon for developing countries.
Above all, the new challenges require greater cooperation between countries and increased commitment on the part of the international community. Here, too, there is hope. The world has just experienced a deadly pandemic that could have been even deadlier without cross-border collaboration. Working together, we were able to produce and distribute effective vaccines at record speed. With global shocks showing no signs of abating and with developing economies bearing the brunt of their impact, this type of shared commitment and united action must become the new normal.
Anna Bjerde is managing director of operations at the World Bank.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the