To commemorate the April 20, 2000, death of “Rose Boy” Yeh Yung-chih (葉永鋕), who had been bullied due to his gender nonconformity, the Ministry of Education last year designated April 20 as Gender Equality Education Day. It is to be observed for the first time on Thursday.
The purpose of highlighting gender equality is to create a society inclusive of all people. Be it in the workplace, on campus or in one’s family, it is hoped that people of all gender identities can be treated with respect and kindness. No discrimination or harassment should be inflicted on someone because of their sexuality or gender.
The meaning and values of Gender Equality Education Day are significant, as they represent an important milestone in the promotion of gender equality in Taiwan.
Regrettably, sexual harassment still accounts for one-third of all cases reported to local administration offices.
When a person is sexually harassed, their autonomy could be severely damaged. Moreover, their basic rights, such as the right to work and the right to education, are infringed.
The workplace is where sexual harassment is most likely to occur, and when it does, such incidents can affect not only the victim’s basic rights, but also their family. It is imperative to tackle the issue seriously and eradicate workplace bullying.
In the past few months, many sexual harassment cases have been reported, and many employers, supervisors and top executives have been charged as perpetrators.
As these investigations proceed, people have questioned the effectiveness of sexual harassment laws, specifically Article 13 of the Act of Gender Equality in Employment (性別工作平等法). It states that “When employers know of the occurrence of sexual harassment ... immediate and effective correctional and remedial measures shall be implemented.”
The provision requires employers to be responsible for the prevention and correction of sexual harassment, meaning they can act as both baseball player and umpire in cases where they themselves are accused of sexual harassment.
As a result, it is unlikely that such cases of sexual harassment would be effectively addressed or remedied, and consequently, the victims would find the act ineffectual.
The Awakening Foundation — in collaboration with Democratic Progressive Party legislators Hung Sun-han (洪申翰), Fan Yun (范雲), Lin I-chin (林宜瑾) and Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) — held a public hearing on the issue. They demanded that an external, independent mechanism for investigating sexual harassment claims against employers should be established.
Experts and academics have said that loopholes in laws should have been addressed a long time ago, adding that a public consensus has already been reached on amending existing laws.
However, some government agencies, on the pretext of a labor shortage, have said they do not want to head up such external investigations.
Endeavoring to solve the problem by pushing forward an amendment, Hung requested that the Ministry of Labor and other agencies review the staffing and budgets of local administration offices as soon as possible.
Sexual harassment in the workplace should not be tolerated. This issue deserves more discussions and attention, and it should be addressed once and for all.
Lee Cheng-lin is a graduate student in National Taipei University’s Department of Law.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS