The Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC), introduced by the Ministry of National Defense, recently received much criticism on the letters pages of local newspapers.
Some readers wrote that the ROTC should be abolished, saying that the overall training environment and hours of ROTC officers are inferior to those of regular officers from public military academies, making it difficult for the training corps graduates to adapt to being in the military or to be promoted.
Other readers wrote that by following the example of the Nanya Institute of Technology — which in 2018 founded the country’s only ROTC military academy in Taoyuan — a private military academy should also be established by a college in northern, central, southern and eastern Taiwan.
I am glad that the public is concerned about national defense and that many are willing to discuss the pros and cons of the ROTC. I have also met or worked with many ROTC officers in the military, so I would like to share some thoughts.
First, ROTC officers can contribute to reform and innovation in the military’s organizational culture. Given that such officers study, live and receive military training at a private college, their approaches and perspectives are often different from those of students who live 24 hours a day under centralized management at regular military academies. This certainly affects military leadership and organizational practice.
ROTC officers can help make adjustments to the conservative and stereotypical practices that are projected by the military’s regulations and orders. ROTC cadres and troops are willing to change gradually while breaking rigid command styles and stern management.
The inclusion of ROTC graduates has the potential to reform the military organizational culture and enhance its efficiency. It cannot be done overnight, but is a work in progress.
Next, high-ranking officials must stop perceiving officers from regular military academies as having more legitimacy than ROTC graduates. There is no difference between them in quality or so-called legitimacy. The key lies in their personal characteristics as well as willingness to give their best to the military.
Those who are willing to contribute can “learn by doing, do by learning,” and ability becomes strong as experience is accumulated in command coordination, leadership, management and administrative integration.
This is certainly not something that can only be achieved by officers from regular military academies. Officers from past special programs and the junior college of the ROTC Military Academy, professional officers, specialty officers, reserve officers and even ROTC officers can also do the job and do it well. The military must first reach such a consensus.
It can be seen from the background of students at the National Defense University’s (NDU) War College or Army, Naval and Air Force Command and Staff Colleges, which are responsible for military officers’ advanced education, that all students who meet the requirements for admission are above standard and with great experience.
When I was teaching at NDU, my students included middle and high-ranking cadres from several officer training systems. Even some of Taiwan’s general officers have risen from alternative officer training systems.
Irrespective of a person’s position or origin, as long as they are committed wholeheartedly to the nation, have an aptitude for the military, and are always willing to learn, they are sure to rise to prominence in the military.
Chang Ling-ling is a retired colonel in the armed forces reserves.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS