As public awareness of gender equality has risen in Taiwan, the percentage of male victims of domestic violence has increased year by year, accounting for 23.4 percent of cases last year, the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) reported recently.
A traditional patriarchal system dictates that men are strong and extroverted while women are passive and introverted. However, the gender framework of “strong men, weak women” is transforming.
Aside from the change in the domestic violence ratio, another major aspect of gender equality awareness deserves greater attention — the imbalance between paternal and maternal rights in cases of discretionary parental rights of minors.
When a couple files for a divorce but cannot reach an agreement on parental rights of their young children, the only way to settle the issue is for a court authority to make a decision. In those cases, a judge almost always orders a social organization to send a social worker to conduct home visits to gain a deeper understanding of the two parties’ backgrounds. The social worker’s report, based on the visits, often influences a judge’s ruling.
In practice, the vast majority of social workers are female. Home visit reports based on a female perspective are often biased in favor of mothers, not to mention the legal principle of granting mothers custody of infant children is an entrenched practice.
Fathers have fewer bargaining chips in a fight for custody of their young children, and enter a dispute with a disadvantage before a lawsuit even begins. Due to the excessive imbalance, minors are the ones most likely to suffer in the end.
When resources allow, home visits should consist of one male and one female social worker, conducting an investigation in collaboration. Changes in approach to gender equality should also involve discussion of discretionary parental rights of minor children, so fathers in Taiwan are no longer at a disadvantage when fighting for custody of their children.
Lee Yen-feng is a lawyer.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
RSS