The US House of Representatives on March 27 passed a bill to revoke China’s “developing country” status. Sponsored by Republican US Representative Young Kim and Democratic US Representative Gerry Connolly, the bill, titled “The People’s Republic of China is Not a Developing Country Act,” was passed by a unanimous vote of 415-0.
It aims to prevent China benefiting from provisions and special treatment in treaties and international organizations, and to undercut its development by recategorizing it as a high-income economy or developed country.
A developing country, also called a less-developed country or emerging market, has low living standards, and an undeveloped industrial base and skills relative to developed countries. More than 120 countries around the world fall into the category, and account for 70 percent of the global population and land area. Until recently, China was considered among them.
However, it is apparent that all of the developing countries and even some developed countries are far behind China in terms of military prowess and economic strength.
In March 2019, then-deputy US trade representative Dennis Shea said during a conference in Geneva, Switzerland, that it no longer makes sense for China to receive developing-nation privileges.
“There is nothing special or differential when a member that has landed a rover on the dark side of the moon ... insists on the same treatment as one of our poorest members,” Shea said.
In June the following year, then-chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific Ted Yoho said that China should no longer be considered a developing country.
As the second-largest economy in the world, China has built five aircraft carriers, developed the Belt and Road Initiative, and has dedicated itself to space projects. Yoho’s points have underscored China’s growing threat to the US and the global community.
For the past decade, China has been directing its economic strength toward its military, endowing its People’s Liberation Army with modern warfare capabilities, such as joint operations, cyberwarfare and space warfare, as well as developing state-of-the-art strategic arms, including stealth aircraft, hypersonic cruise missiles and anti-satellite weapons.
Meanwhile, China has not slowed down its development of nuclear weapons, submarines and the capability to conduct information warfare. The efforts accumulated over the years have enabled China to transform its military into a modern fighting force on a par with those of leading European powers like the UK, France and Germany.
Ranked third for its military strength and second for military spending, China, aside from its military prowess, also demonstrated exceptional capabilities in developing new energy resources, high-speed rail, supercomputers, quantum networks and artificial intelligence.
As China accounted for 18.6 percent of the global economy last year, second only to the US, it cannot continue receiving privileges and treatments in international organizations.
US representatives unanimously passing the bill to deprive China of its developing country status is a wake-up call to the rest of the world: In view of China’s overall power, it should no longer be treated as a developing country, but an authoritarian regime that poses a lethal threat to global security and the economy.
Yao Chung-yuan is an adjunct professor and former deputy director of the Ministry of National Defense’s strategic planning department.
Translated by Rita Wang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS