Cross-strait policy has always been a central focus of presidential elections. New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) recently said that he “respects” the so-called “1992 consensus,” but beat around the bush when asked if he endorses it.
Hou prevaricated by saying that the public needs to reach a consensus to safeguard the peace and prosperity of the Republic of China.
Asked how he would unite the “anti-Democratic Progressive Party [DPP] camp,” Hou said that people should collaborate with each other, since the purpose of presidential elections is to work for the greater good of Taiwanese and the nation, not to bring about social division regardless of political affiliation and identity.
When it comes to sensitive or controversial issues, Hou has generally responded with bureaucratic language. Whether such remarks are filled with political shenanigans is open to interpretation, but as Hou dodges every question thrown at him, he has made the public suspicious of his character and competency.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have been reiterating the “1992 consensus” to bolster ties with China, repeatedly reassuring Beijing of the KMT’s unchanged stance.
However, the DPP and the majority of Taiwanese know that the “1992 consensus” is a self-humiliating act that renders Taiwan a sitting duck awaiting a Chinese invasion.
It should have been clear as day what the consensus implies, but Hou continues to waver, stoking suspicion that he is not averse to being at the mercy of Beijing.
Chu claims that the KMT would unite all “anti-DPP camps” to defeat the DPP. As Chu works on exacerbating political polarization and social division to arouse anti-DPP sentiments, would not Hou’s proposal of “collaboration” go against Chu’s party line?
Would Hou dare speak out against the party elite, including Chu? It would be far wiser for him to take a clear stance if he has a better opinion to offer and refrain from pussyfooting around.
Chen Ho-wen
Taipei
Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese. The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international
This month, the National Health Insurance (NHI) is to implement a major policy change by eliminating the suspension-and-resumption mechanism for Taiwanese residing abroad. With more than 210,000 Taiwanese living overseas — many with greater financial means than those in Taiwan — this reform, catalyzed by a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, underscores the importance of fairness, sustainability and shared responsibility in one of the world’s most admired public healthcare systems. Beyond legal obligations, expatriates have a compelling moral duty to contribute, recognizing their stake in a system that embodies the principle of health as a human right. The ruling declared the prior
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) appears to be encountering some culture shock and safety issues at its new fab in Arizona. On Nov. 7, Arizona state authorities cited TSMC for worker safety violations, fining the company US$16,131, after a man died in May. The Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health released its six-month investigation into the fatality and cited TSMC for failing to keep the workplace free from hazards likely to cause death or serious harm. At about the same time, the chip giant was also sued for alleged discriminatory hiring practices favoring Asians, prompting a flurry of debate on whether TSMC’s
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲) has motioned to abolish the “Wu Sz-huai” (吳斯懷) clauses of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) — which forbid all Taiwanese who enter China from engaging in any activities detrimental to national security or interests. This motion led the Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP) to report her for infringing upon the National Security Act (國家安全法), which Weng called a lawless and undisciplined attempt to threaten a legislator. However, the true lawless and undisciplined person is Weng — the one standing in the enemy
RSS