The job market has never offered any guarantees. Mechanization wiped out once-secure careers in manufacturing. Now artificial intelligence (AI) is coming for a future generation of jobs that had seemed safe, starting with software coding and back-office work. So what can be done about it?
Despite some hyperbolic fears, there are reasons to be optimistic about the future of technology. It has the potential to bring a better quality of life and more widespread prosperity — eventually. To prosper in this future, workers need new skills and a different education. That means rethinking how we approach college and what we want it to provide us.
Most college degrees pay off not only in higher wages, but because they mean graduates are less likely to be unemployed, or be unemployed for less time. Evolving technology in the late 20th century put a higher premium on more education, leading more people to go to college.
Illustration: Yusha
The share of the population over the age of 25 with some post-secondary education doubled between 1980 and 2021 to more than 60 percent. This increased the supply of graduates and shrunk the wage premium for college degrees.
More people going to college also means more bad outcomes: more dropouts and more degrees that do not pay off. Meanwhile, the price of education has skyrocketed. So it is no surprise that many people are asking if college is even worth it anymore.
It is. With new technology it will be more valuable than ever.
If the past is any guide, thriving in an age of technological innovation requires being adaptable and finding different ways to add value. For example, machines that could weave cloth at scale displaced many workers, but master craftspeople who made goods of exceptional quality still had jobs. Other people had to learn how to work a machine.
It was not an easy transition; there was a lot of social upheaval and displacement. How the population was educated changed to suit the new economy, and it took several decades for workers to adapt. Industrialization is a big reason universal public education was adopted.
Today’s technology arguably poses more challenges because some white-collar jobs are sure to disappear, too. So far, large language models such as ChatGPT are good at synthesizing existing information to make a decent argument or find a solution to problems. The technology is only going to get more powerful, although its creative abilities are likely to be limited.
Psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer says that AI is better suited to tasks where risks are well defined and the parameters are stable, such as playing chess. It is less good at dealing with problems where there is more uncertainty. We are likely to face more of the latter, because data and knowledge from the past tells little about a fast-changing future. Past data can even be misleading.
Human judgement can be expected to remain critical, and the value might even be super-charged for people who learn to use the new technology properly, Gigerenzer says.
Interpersonal skills will also be prized. High-touch human time will be the rarest of commodities. Most importantly, thriving would require constantly learning new things and adapting swiftly, because no one knows how new technology will unfold.
In short, success is likely to come to those who know how to think and think well. This means students must hone their critical thinking skills as part of their education.
Getting that out of a college degree requires two things: different expectations and class selection on the part of students, and for universities and colleges to revamp their approach to curricula.
Even before AI, society struggled to figure out what a post-secondary education should provide. US universities and colleges were originally intended to be liberal arts institutions that aimed to make well-rounded, thoughtful leaders. In contrast to the European model where students specialize early, US students were meant to get a more cursory exposure to many different fields.
This was reasonable when a small share of the population went to college and it was not too expensive, but as more people pursued higher education and costs rose, the expectation changed. Students wanted a more vocational and career-focused education, and were less interested in reading Plato.
Meanwhile, colleges and universities stopped doing either job well. Many students struggle to apply their degree to the job market, and the education they receive has become less rigorous.
One study found little improvement in critical-thinking skills during the first few years among 45 percent of students.
It is understandable the people want a clearer path to a career from their degrees, but treating college strictly as vocational education limits students’ skills. Now that critical and creative-thinking skills are even more essential, US schools should embrace and improve on their original mission that aims to produce well-rounded thinkers.
There are ways to make any college major more practical or to integrate the humanities, says Preston Cooper, a fellow at the Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity who has researched the value of degrees.
For instance, high-return degrees such as nursing could include more liberal arts classes. More traditional humanities majors, such as history, could include marketing and communications courses. This would impart hard skills and broader thinking ability, and students would enter the labor force more employable and adaptable.
In the short run, it is up to students to challenge themselves and take the initiative to make their college education more AI-proof. They need to seek out the classes that make them think more rigorously, including math, and probability and statistics. Then balance those with humanities where they learn history and how to write well.
AI might do more writing for us in the future, but knowing how to write well helps clarify and organize your thoughts.
Students should develop a reading list that allows them to explore the great minds of the past and contemplate how to apply their insights to current times.
Here are a few recommendations to start with: Plato’s The Republic — the best book on the nature of education and its relationship to politics; Machiavelli’s The Prince — on how to master fortune as far as humanly possible; Abraham Lincoln’s greatest speeches — statesmanship at the highest level; Hannah Arendt’s The Origins of Totalitarianism — perspectives on how to respond to efforts to dehumanize; and Roderick Floud’s and Deirdre McCloskey’s Economic History of Britain — how does a market come into being and change the world?
Face it, harder classes mean a lot more work and might mean worse grades, but it would be the best insurance students can get from whatever change technology is going to be throwing at them.
This is how they can get greater value from their degree — and in the new economy it will be more valuable than ever. The sooner they get started the better.
Allison Schrager is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering economics and a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion
of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS