Terry Gou naive on China
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), who once said that “democracy is not food,” recently announced that he is once again running for the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential nomination.
That Gou is launching his presidential bid for a second time proves that “democracy” is a way of life in Taiwan. If he lived in China, he would have no chance of running for president, because in Beijing, democracy certainly is not food.
Although the tycoon is good at business, some of his comments on national policies are stunning. Confronted by China, which wants to annex Taiwan, Gou shows naivety when expressing his ideas. For example, the best way to prevent war is to be prepared to win, so Taiwan must obtain suitable and sufficient weapons to deter a potential annexation by China.
However, Gou said that if Taiwan buys too many weapons, China would hit the areas where they are stored.
I would like to ask Gou: As a presidential candidate, do you oppose military procurement?
When announcing his presidential bid at a news conference early this month, Gou said that to avoid Taiwanese children living under “a hail of bullets,” nobody should support the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), as it advocates for Taiwan independence.
Obviously, he was not aware of a recent poll in which 54 percent of respondents supported Taiwan independence and only 10 percent supported “unification” with China. Or does he dare not to recall the poll?
The DPP has been in power twice for nearly 16 years. Has it ever let children live under a hail of bullets?
It seems as if Gou implies that Taiwan can only protect itself by surrendering to the Chinese Communist Party. If that is what he means, he has underestimated the ability of the armed forces and the determination of Taiwan’s democratic allies.
Chiu Ping-chin
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not