As a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine is still nowhere to be seen, Finland has joined NATO. In the meantime, French President Emmanuel Macron and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, following in Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez’s footsteps, visited Beijing. US President Joe Biden verbally tried to stop them, but to no avail. What does the EU want and what is in the minds of those European leaders?
For France and Spain, the main purpose was to gain more economic benefits from China. Macron has been troubled by social issues at home for some time. To divert attention, his visit was aimed at boosting bilateral trade between China and France. Since China has been isolated by the West, Macron knew that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) needed to rely on the EU. At the same time, Xi tried to increase the EU’s dependence on China, whose foreign trade is in a grim situation.
Moreover, the EU nations intended to break the collusion between Russia and China. During their visits, European leaders conveyed messages to Beijing, hoping that Xi could rein in Russian President Vladimir Putin.
They also displayed to Xi the extent to which they could accept Beijing’s affiliation with Moscow. That the EU demanded Xi to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy was to test how genuine China could be.
The EU made it clear: The relationship between China and Europe would be jeopardized if China sent military aid to Russia. Confronting a recuperated Russia is the last thing European leaders want.
However, it is doubtful whether the relationship between European countries and China can become stronger than before.
First, given that German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s visit to China was criticized, Macron visited Beijing with the EU president because they did not want China to complain.
Second, even though the EU confirmed its dependence on China’s market, European nations know that they cannot entirely depend on China for critical products. To minimize the risk of relying too much on China, the European Chips Act is likely to be approved soon, and the Netherlands has limited China’s access to advanced semiconductor machinery.
The EU’s Foreign Subsidiary Regulation aims to counter the threat to European industry, and G7 nations have planned to fight against “economic threat.”
Meanwhile, France, Germany and Italy made more commitments to the Indo-Pacific region.
The EU wants to break the alliance between China and Russia, and European leaders want to establish economic ties with Beijing. Apart from bilateral trade and nonmilitary cooperation, the EU is wary of China, as evidenced by how the French and EU officials only promised to “work on” processing the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment.
Clearly, the EU has utilized the investment agreement as political leverage to deal with Beijing.
The relationship between the EU and China depends on how close Beijing is to Moscow. The EU is betting on China as a peacemaker, to bring Putin to the negotiation table.
Under the pressure from the US, the EU took the initiative to assure Beijing that it would not detach from China. Beijing’s reaction to such “kindness” is yet to be seen, but it would be difficult for Xi to cater to both sides.
Chang Meng-jen is chair of Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Italian Language and Culture, and coordinator of the university’s diplomacy and international affairs program.
Translated by Emma Liu
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s