The Ministry of Justice recently proposed to amend Article 1085 of the Civil Code, which states that “parents may, within the limit of necessity, inflict punishment upon their children.”
The proposal has generated much discussion in society. More than 6,000 cases of domestic violence were recorded in 2021, the Ministry of Health and Welfare said, adding that the most frequent type of violence was “improper physical treatment.”
Among the abusers, 80 percent either lacked parental knowledge or were accustomed to corporal punishment of children. Some other common factors include parents’ financial difficulties, intimate partner violence, mental health problems and drug abuse.
In a case of domestic violence against young children in 2021, the Hualien District Court ruled that despite the seriousness of child abuse, Taiwan has not abolished parents’ legal right to punish their children. Countries such as Germany and Japan have done so, and Taiwan should follow suit.
Although Taiwan has implemented the Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act (兒童及少年福利與權益保障法) and the Implementation Act of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (兒童權利公約施行法), which prohibit corporal punishment on children, parents’ legal right to punish children remains in the Civil Code.
Therefore, parents can inflict punishments such as beating, scolding, grounding and even fasting to discipline their children.
The legal system does not outlaw physical punishment of children in the household, and the key lies in whether a punishment complies with the “principle of proportionality,” which is often why abusers are not considered to break the law. The proposed amendment aims to eliminate domestic violence. The Ministry of Justice has emphasized that the law would not deprive parents of the right to discipline their children, but it would ban the use of violence.
The purpose of parental disciplinary power in the law is to discipline children, rather than to punish them. The amendment seeks to bring Taiwan in line with international human rights.
However, since most abusers lack knowledge of modern parenting, they rely on traditional methods used by previous generations. Consequently, they discipline their children through corporal punishment.
A fundamental solution requires collaboration between social, labor and education sectors. They should support the proposed amendment and respond to the public’s calls, working together to build a parent-friendly workplace, reduce tax burdens, provide financial aid, increase childcare services, promote family education and positive discipline. In doing so, a quality child-rearing environment can be created.
Chen Tien-ting is an educational administrator in Hsinchu City.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
RSS