Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) yesterday began a 20-day visit to the US, saying that his goal is “understanding the US” and “letting the world understand the TPP.”
The visit is widely regarded as the start of the former Taipei mayor’s presidential campaign and a signal that a rumored joint ticket in next year’s presidential election between Ko and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) is no longer viable.
Ko hinted at his intention to run for president as early as 2019. Not much later, speculation began that he might team up with Gou, and after the Hon Hai founder indicated that he might also run, several rounds of negotiations were held between the two. The TPP nominated former Hon Hai employee Ann Kao (高虹安) as legislator-at-large candidate for the 2020 elections, and neither Ko nor Gou ran for legislator.
However, after Gou on Friday said that he would seek the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential nomination and Ko touted his US tour as a TPP-centered venture, a joint ticket seems very unlikely.
Asked about Gou’s call for unity against the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Ko said he is against the idea of a “non-green alliance to remove the DPP,” and sarcastically asked whether such an alliance would enable “the KMT to rule again and continue its corruption.”
Calling the TPP Taiwan’s “third force,” Ko said that the party must work to find more international space for Taiwan amid conflicts between the US and China, and Taiwan’s pan-green and pan-blue camps.
The TPP’s goals are “Taiwan autonomy” and cross-strait peace, as well as forming “a coalition government” based on solidary among Taiwanese, Ko said, adding that he is the only politician who can unite the nation.
In an interview with Japanese news magazine Nikkei Asia, Ko last week sought to set his party apart from the pan-green and pan-blue camps, saying that the DPP is “too pro-war,” while the KMT is “too deferential toward China.” The TPP “will not provoke war,” even though it is “not afraid of war” and would “prepare for war,” he said, adding that a TPP-led government would lower the risk of war breaking out.
Ko said Taiwan should learn from Japan’s and Singapore’s relations with China and the US, adding that the two deal with the pressures from the two superpowers “with great flexibility.”
However, it remains to be seen whether Ko’s ideas can sway anyone in Washington, as well as Taiwanese voters in next year’s elections, especially as his remarks have been inconsistent, with many causing controversy and earning him labels such as “a speculator,” “political chameleon” and “person without core conviction.”
Ko’s remarks ranged from describing himself as “deep green” to telling an event in Shanghai that the “two sides of the [Taiwan] Strait are one family” and are “a community with a shared destiny.” He has also said that Taiwan’s aim should be “befriending the US and being friendly to China” and that it should “remain an equal distance with superpowers.”
Ko’s latest remark that Taiwan should learn from Japan’s and Singapore’s China policies is also flawed, as the two countries do not deal with Beijing denying their sovereignty, and Japan has a solid military alliance with the US. Taiwan’s relationships with the US and China are more complicated than Ko acknowledges. Instead of approaching the two superpowers “with great flexibility,” Taiwanese leaders are forced to walk a tightrope.
In past elections, TPP voters were mostly young and politically unaffiliated. Ko has branded his party as a force that can overcome Taiwan’s two-party system, but whether his unpredictable and ambiguous stance can continue to sway voters frustrated about the DPP-KMT rivalry is questionable.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS