Nine years have passed since March 30, 2014, when half a million people gathered on Taipei’s Ketagalan Boulevard to protest against the Cross-Strait Agreement on Trade in Services. While originally intended to express concern about the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government throwing Taiwan’s door wide open to China, the rally also voiced widespread disapproval of police’s bloody dispersal of protesters occupying part of the Executive Yuan, which had happened one week earlier, in the early hours of March 24.
Unfortunately, then-premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and other government officials who instigated the police deployment have never been called to account, and neither have the police officers who acted violently, but who, according to the police, “could not be identified.”
It is therefore welcome news that on March 23, nine years after the events, the Control Yuan proposed a set of corrective measures to the Executive Yuan, the Ministry of the Interior, the National Police Agency, the Taipei City Police Department and the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office, telling them to review their actions and make improvements. For the victims of that night’s police violence, this belated justice is a small victory, but also a great one.
The damage that was done that night can hardly be erased. It came as a shock that police methods characteristic of the authoritarian era could still be employed in a free and democratic Taiwan. Nonetheless, through many years of litigation and the Control Yuan’s corrective measures, we have told the public that when police face a crowd of protesters employing civil disobedience, it is wrong to attack them and treat them in a vindictive manner.
The Control Yuan’s decision also gives another slap in the face to Ma and Jiang for saying that they supported police’s eviction of the student protesters and that police got the crowd to leave by just “patting them on the shoulder.”
In recent years, China’s hostility to Taiwan has been going from bad to worse. Its use of the Internet and economic, political, military and other means to threaten Taiwan has become commonplace. Were it not for the Sunflower movement, would the nation have been lured into a trap set by China? What about Ma, who is attracting attention with his visit to China? Does he still think that signing the service trade agreement with China was the right thing to do?
Pan Kuan is a New Taipei City resident who took part in the 2014 Sunflower movement.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS