Taiwan has become more aware of risks involving cryptocurrencies since the collapse of the FTX exchange late last year, and is following in the footsteps of Singapore and Hong Kong in keeping a keener eye on the crypto sector.
Last week, the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) announced guidelines for crypto service providers and exchanges, 10 days after confirming that it oversees crypto-related investments and transactions nationwide.
It said it has received instructions from the Executive Yuan to oversee the crypto sector’s development in Taiwan. It is to focus on establishing a self-regulating mechanism for service providers that allows members of the sector to monitor their own legal, ethical and security standards, rather than acting as an outside regulatory agency that monitors and enforces those standards.
The guidelines include the disclosure of information by crypto service providers, the review procedure for the listing and removal of crypto products, the separation of assets between service providers and clients, and the assurance of transparency and fairness.
Preventing money laundering, protecting consumers’ interests, maintaining information security, promoting institutional auditing, and managing so-called “hot” and “cold” crypto wallets are also part of the guidelines.
As the commission seems to have no intention to establish special legislation on the crypto sector, but aims to focus on protecting consumers and preventing money laundering, its regulatory approach should allow the local crypto sector room for further development and innovation.
Except for the review procedure for the listing and removal of products, which could have a greater effect on the sector, other guidelines, such as information disclosure, asset separation and money laundering prevention, are all basic requirements that firms in the sector should implement.
Another reason that the commission does not want to act as a comprehensive regulatory body is that it is not easy to govern the crypto sector, let alone require cooperation from offshore service providers or exchanges to comply with Taiwan’s regulatory framework.
In general, it is welcome news that the regulator supports growth in Taiwan’s crypto sector and wants to help build the necessary ecosystem here, as it is an opportunity for the sector to build trust with the public and push its innovations toward the mainstream.
However, if the details of its guidelines, which are slated to be published by the third quarter of this year, are too cumbersome, it would likely stifle the development of Taiwan’s crypto sector and push local investors toward offshore crypto platforms, which would be contrary to the commission’s original intention of protecting consumers in devising a regulatory framework.
Moreover, as innovative blockchain applications and non-fungible tokens continue to emerge, the regulator does need to retain the flexibility of development in the sector and allow it to continue moving forward.
While doing everything at once is not an option for the commission, it must at least reserve the power to inspect domestic crypto platforms when things go wrong. It also has to work with crypto firms to establish a mechanism for consumer protection.
At the same time, the commission needs to ask foreign firms to comply with Taiwan’s consumer protection and financial regulations. Most importantly, it must continue to review and adjust its regulatory measures on a rolling basis to ensure the sector’s long-term development.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS