Cooperation between Taiwan and the V4 countries — the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland and Hungary — has been growing. The V4, or the Visegrad Group, is an informal regional format of cooperation between the four central European countries, which are linked by common geopolitical issues, along with shared cultures and values.
Thanks to their donations of vaccines to Taiwan, these countries gained substantial political goodwill locally. Within and outside Taiwan, the V4 countries — with the exception of Hungary — have gained recognition as European vanguards that have increasingly frequent interactions with Taiwan.
During a telephone conversation on Jan. 28 between President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and then-Czech president-elect Petr Pavel, for example, he expressed hope for an in-person meeting with Tsai.
Data collected by the EU-Taiwan Tracker — developed by the Central European Institute of Asian Studies — show that the EU recorded a significant increase in Taiwan-related activity from 2019 to last year. In 2019, only 23 interactions were recorded across the entire EU.
Last year, despite the previous three years of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number increased more than sevenfold, with 167 recorded interactions.
Central and eastern European countries were major contributors to this increase, responsible for almost 60 percent of all interactions last year. This has been mostly thanks to the activities of Lithuania, Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Poland — three of which are V4 countries — with the first two having more yearly engagements with Taiwan than major EU member states, such as France and Germany.
Does increased interaction between countries also translate to an increased mutual awareness? The Sinophone Borderlands online poll, conducted from 2020 to last year, examined how Taiwanese perceive people in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, and vice versa. Surveyed were more than 1,350 respondents in each of the five countries.
The poll showed that there is limited mutual knowledge and awareness among Taiwan and the V4 countries. However, there are positive trends that both sides can build upon to improve their images further.
Taiwan is perceived neutrally among the V4 countries. Polish and Czech respondents tended to be slightly more favorable toward Taiwan than Hungarian and Slovak respondents.
Polish respondents were the most positive about Taiwan, with 36 percent expressing positive or very positive feelings, with only 27 percent expressing negative or very negative attitudes.
Accordingly, the average sentiment among Polish respondents toward Taiwan was 53, with 100 being the highest positive indicator and 50 showing neutrality.
A relatively large group of respondents held neutral views of Taiwan compared with neutral perceptions of other actors. This suggests that many people lack a clear, knowledgeable position on Taiwan compared with other powers such as Russia and the US.
Moreover, comparing perceptions toward Taiwan and Japan suggests that a potential exists to improve Taiwan’s image in the region via public diplomacy.
Digging deeper into societal divisions based on socio-demographic variables such as gender, age and education, as well as divisions according to the political preferences of the respondents, the data suggest that those with more awareness and knowledge of Taiwan tend to regard the nation more positively.
Also of interest are divisions based on political party affiliation. Among the V4 countries, political divisions are especially visible in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, and in Poland to a lesser degree. Interestingly, there are no visible differences between voters of Hungary’s governing Fidesz party and its opposition, despite Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban cozying up to China and Russia over the past decade.
Czech political parties have been taking positions on Taiwan driven by their ideologies and strategic outlooks. This finding also aligns with previous studies suggesting that China is a politicized topic in the Czech Republic and that Czech society is polarized in its Taiwan approach.
In Taiwan, the V4 countries are already seen positively — although less so than countries such as Japan, Australia, Germany, Singapore and the US. Taiwanese respondents expressed average perception scores of 59 toward the Czech Republic, 58 toward Slovakia and Hungary, and 62 toward Poland.
For each of the four countries, the share of respondents expressing positive or very positive views ranged from 54 to 65 percent, while the corresponding share of negative or very negative sentiments ranged from 20 to 28 percent.
Supporters of the Democratic Progressive Party were more favorable toward the V4 countries than those who support the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Also, higher education and political interest, among other factors, correlate with more positive views of the V4 countries.
The findings suggest that efficient public diplomacy, which would spread awareness about Taiwan and the V4 countries on both sides, can further improve mutual impressions and understanding. Favorable public opinion on both sides can serve as an important driver for deeper engagements between the countries.
Kristina Kironska is advocacy director at the Central European Institute of Asian Studies and assistant professor at Palacky University Olomouc in the Czech Republic.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS