On Feb. 25, two suspects in the “88 bullet shootings” case in Tainan on Nov. 10 last year were extradited to Taiwan after being arrested in China.
Prosecutor-General Hsing Tai-chao (邢泰釗) visited Tainan to thank law enforcement officers for their efforts in a moment that looked good for the police.
However, on March 6, alleged gangsters booked a high-profile banquet at a hotel in Taipei, with dozens of attractive “waitresses” lined up to greet attendees.
This might have been a mere act of self-promotion by the gangsters — with the goals being to make a big impression, boost their income from dispute resolution and attract more young men to join — but the ostentation seems to have created the impression that law enforcement is no match for the underworld.
Another example was on Wednesday last week, when an alleged gang leader in New Taipei City’s Lujhou District (蘆洲) laid on an ostentatious procession for his mother’s funeral.
What should the government do about this phenomenon of gangsters gathering for noisy weddings, funerals and celebrations? Which department should handle them and on what legal basis?
In 1991, the Japanese government drew up the Act on the Prevention of Wrongful Acts by Organized Crime Group Members, also known as the Anti-boryokudan Act, in response to brazen behavior by yakuza. The law, which was formulated under the guidance of Japan’s National Police Agency, came into force in 1992. It combines substantive regulations concerning crimes committed by members of violent gangs and procedural regulations that forbid gangster involvement in some matters.
The results of implementation over the following two decades prove that the law has succeeded to some extent in controlling gangs in Japan.
Last year, Satoru Nomura, president of the Kyushu region’s Kudokai syndicate, was sentenced to death by the Fukuoka District Court for one murder and three attempted murders on the basis of the Anti-boryokudan Act and the Japanese penal code.
Taiwan’s police, prosecutors and judges would probably be astonished by such a verdict.
The Organized Crime Prevention Act (組織犯罪防制條例) was implemented to deal with gangs, but it has not had a deterrent effect since 2021, when the then-Council of Grand Justices ruled in Interpretation No. 812 that forced labor as a punishment for criminal offenses was unconstitutional.
However, the Ministry of Justice, which is the authority of the Organized Crime Prevention Act, has not done anything about it, so the only tools left for police to restrain gangs are things like spot checks, which have absolutely no deterrent effect.
Unless gang leaders are willing to spare the embarrassment of police officers, nothing can be done about their activities, even were the prosecutor-general to be there in person.
Under the principles of democracy and rule of law, Taiwan’s law enforcement agencies are in a weak position compared with criminal gangs.
Could Taipei not transfer authority to legislate, amend and interpret the Organized Crime Prevention Act from the Ministry of Justice to the Ministry of the Interior? The interior ministry could examine the act with reference to the legal systems of Japan and other countries, and submit a set of draft amendments to be deliberated by the Legislative Yuan.
The interior ministry would then have to show that it is determined to enforce the amended law, while civic groups could monitor its implementation and evaluate its effectiveness. Surely this could be done without too much difficulty.
During the Martial Law period, the Ministry of Justice was in charge of writing and amending laws, which meant it was easy for a lack of division of power and unclear division of responsibilities to emerge. If authority to amend the Organized Crime Prevention Act could be transferred to satisfy society’s demand that criminal gangs be controlled, there might be some changes in the situation.
Jeng Shann-yinn is a professor in Kainan University’s Department of Law.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Deterrence is fading; war is looming on the Taiwan Strait and for other targets of the China-enabled dictatorship alliance, and after three years the cure is just dawning on the Biden Administration. Now mind you, for a May 28, 2024 interview with Time magazine, President Joe Biden made his 5th public commitment that the United States would defend Taiwan. Less than three weeks later the United States Navy, along with ships from navies of Japan, Canada, the Netherlands, and France, were conducting the Valiant Shield joint force exercise in the Philippine Sea south of Taiwan and in the South China Sea to
The official media of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) reacted to the May 20 inauguration speech of President William Lai (賴清德) by asserting: “Lai’s words reveal his true intention of sacrificing peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait for his own desire for power.” This baseless accusation by Beijing that Lai is manipulating Taiwanese to resist unification with China for his personal gain, is part of a broader CCP information warfare campaign that has intensified since Lai’s election. This campaign, orchestrated by the United Front Work Department, the CCP’s agency for coordinating influence operations and propaganda, aims to demoralize Taiwanese,
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
Minister of Health and Welfare Chiu Tai-yuan (邱泰源) on Friday said the ministry supports keeping priority seats on public transportation, but is considering expanding the eligibility criteria and renaming the seats. Chiu’s remarks came after local news media over the past few weeks reported incidents involving priority seats, once again sparking heated discussion about whether the seats should be abolished or regulations regarding them should be revised. On June 11, an older woman asked a young woman on a Taipei MRT train to yield her priority seat. The young woman refused, saying that she needed the seat after working a 12-hour shift.