The International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant issued on Friday last week for Russian President Vladimir Putin delighted Uighurs, as Putin’s today signals Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) tomorrow.
The crimes committed by Xi are many times more serious than what Putin has been accused of.
Putin has caused more than 8 million people to flee Ukraine. By imprisoning more than 3 million Uighurs in concentration camps and restricting the movement of more than 10 million Uighurs, Xi has not only denied them the opportunity to live humanely, but also the opportunity to escape oppression.
The 8 million Ukrainians who fled their homeland and took refuge in Europe are lucky compared with the 15 million Uighurs who suffer under the occupation of East Turkestan, known as Xinjiang in China.
The ICC counted Putin’s bombing of Ukrainians for one year as one of his crimes. While Xi has not dropped bombs on Uighurs, he has broken up 1 million families through imprisonment, forced labor and forced sterilization.
The only difference between these murderers is that one can count the number of people Putin has killed: The UN recorded a civilian death toll of 8,231. With Xi, it is impossible to count, but he cannot hide them all.
The 700,000 detainees listed in Xinjiang police files only include people who were arrested in dozens of counties in East Turkestan. These people were captured because of their ethnic identity, because they were the original inhabitants of East Turkestan and because they refused to accept Sinicization.
That means the detainees in the files are prisoners of a smokeless war that has been going on for 70 years. While Putin has been rightly criticized many times for mistreating prisoners of war, Xi’s silent killing of prisoners is not even mentioned.
Although Xi has concealed the true number of those killed in the Uighur genocide, he cannot hide the genocidal orders he issued. Leaked documents exposed the order “to break their lineage, break their roots” and to show “absolutely no mercy” toward Uighurs.
Xi is blocking discussion of the Uighur issue at the UN, banning the publication of a Uighur report and not allowing an independent investigation of East Turkestan. Putin has not pleaded guilty, but Xi has on occasion unknowingly confessed.
For example: The 2017 and 2018 population statistics for China show that birth rates in Hotan Prefecture and the city of Kashgar plummeted.
German anthropologist Adrian Zanz concluded that 1 million fewer Uighurs were born during those two years — the peak of mass incarceration in the Uighur region. Putin might have killed 100,000 people, but Xi prevented 1 million Uighurs from coming into the world, killed many, and kept others in prisons and camps.
In Ukraine, houses have collapsed, but in East Turkestan, despite buildings still standing, 95 percent of the people inside the houses have been deprived of the right to live a normal life.
In some cases, the houses have even become tools of torture. Comparing the 44 Uighurs who died in the Urumqi fire caused by Xi’s COVID-19 lockdown policy with those who have died in during the bombing of Ukraine reflects the difference in the crimes committed by Xi and Putin.
More than 20 countries, including three members states of the UN Security Council, have recognized China’s policy on Uighurs as genocide or as at risk of causing genocide.
The EU and the UN have concluded that the situation is at risk of causing crimes against humanity.
Furthermore, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has committed the crime of 70 years of dictatorship over Chinese, and the death of 3 million people around the world from COVID-19, which originated in China.
By hiding the virus when it first emerged in China, Xi extended the damage and became the person to cause the largest death toll in the world.
It is only a matter of time before an arrest warrant is issued for Xi. The current ICC warrant should worry Xi more than it does Putin, as he is probably acutely aware that he will be next.
Kok Bayraq is a Uighur-American observer.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS