On Dec. 27 last year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) announced that conscription would be restored to one year for male Taiwanese born after Jan. 1, 2005. The reform won the support of the majority of citizens, while the US and Japan indicated approval of Taiwan’s resolve to boost its self-defense and deterrence capabilities.
The reform included bolstering training, raising wages for conscripts, recognizing mandatory service under the labor pension system and studying how the education system can be made more flexible to help young men effectively use their time and build careers.
The training program’s content would also be upgraded to include the use of drones, Stinger, Javelin and Kestrel missiles, and other new weapons to meet the needs of modern warfare.
This paradigm shift is laudable, but the mainstay of the policy seems to be centered on hard military skills.
Modern warfare is no longer restricted to two armies clashing. The possession of advanced weapons is a prerequisite, but warfare has become more complex, all-encompassing and diverse. Combat has spilled over from military and political warfare to “smokeless battlefields” such as the economy, finance, trade, diplomacy, public opinion, cognitive warfare, information, cyber and technology.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has shown that advances in technology have ushered in a new type of warfare, and reforms should take that into account.
Cyberattacks are easy to launch, but difficult to defend. As it takes time to train professionals, the government should recruit conscripts learned in computer science for cyberwarfare training and make them members of information security teams. They could monitor cyberattacks from China, develop cyberwarfare tools, create a training environment for information security, help the public sector with information security and work with local governments to promote information on security.
As cognitive warfare is the extension of psychological warfare and political warfare beyond the battlefield, it can help boost the morale of Taiwanese.
However, if the enemy launches a cognitive attack and Taiwan does not defend it properly, there could be conflict and social unrest that could lead to social division, civil dysfunction and a stagnation of industrial development.
Similarly, the government could enlist conscripts with cognitive warfare-related backgrounds for additional training, establish a “myth-busting” team to counter China’s cognitive attacks and work with civic groups to design compelling, easy-to-follow activities to raise the public’s awareness about cognitive warfare and media literacy to spot disinformation.
Aside from those soft military skills, the government could also take other fields into account, such as electronic warfare, data analysis and big data, combined warfare with artificial intelligence, reinforcement of basic infrastructure and defense of combat supplies, natural resources, and transport systems.
As soft military skills are different from those needed in field operations, the government might have to decrease the intensity of physical training.
Tsai said that “under this new system, the one year spent in the military will not be wasted.”
Making the proposed changes, this goal can be reached. After completing service, the skills acquired in the military can turn conscripts into much sought-after talents, leaders in civic military groups or elites in the all-out defense system. The government must look into the research, planning and implementation of soft skills needed in various battlefield scenarios.
Eugene Yeh is a former director-general of the National Center for High-performance Computing.
Translated by Rita Wang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS