The completed hull of what appears to be a China’s People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) new-generation frigate has recently been spotted in a dry dock at the Hudong (滬東) shipyard in Shanghai. If so, the Chinese navy would soon commence the next stage of its naval expansion.
The PLAN’s rapid expansion is reflected in the outcome of a war game by US think tank the Center for Strategic and International Studies simulating an attack by China against Taiwan in 2026, which found that Taiwan would not have enough anti-ship missiles.
Sam Tangredi of the US Naval War College has written about his concern that the US does not have enough warships.
Meanwhile, a satellite photograph posted on Twitter by former US submarine warfare officer Tom Shugart, now a senior fellow in the defense program at the Center for a New American Security, shows what looks like a new class of frigate under construction in the Hudong shipyard.
At about 147m long and 18m wide, the ship looks like a configuration of the Type-054B frigate. It is bigger than the Type-054A — which is 134m long and 16m wide — while being a bit smaller than the standard Type-052D destroyer — which at 157m long and 18m wide, and an estimated displacement of 6,000 tonnes, is also known as the Luyang III-class destroyer.
The navy’s hard-kill anti-ship missile interception systems mostly employ rapid-firing cannon close-in weapon systems or short-range missiles.
However, if faced with super-saturation attacks involving a combination of low-altitude, low-speed small drones and subsonic and supersonic anti-ship missiles, they would have problems such as difficult detection and chaotic queuing, resulting in insufficient interception.
The only systems tested to effectively intercept such attacks are directed-energy weapons, such as shipborne laser and high-power microwave weapons, which are likely to become standard equipment on new-generation ships.
However, the high energy consumption of directed-energy weapons and phased-array radars makes them dependent on stable sources of electric power. This is why the UK’s Type 45 — or Daring-class — destroyers, the US’ Zumwalt-class destroyers and the UK’s two Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers all employ integrated full-electric propulsion.
If the Type-054B frigate uses integrated full-electric propulsion, as it reportedly does, it would likely be equipped with shipborne laser and high-power microwave weapons.
The PLAN’s development of its Type-052C/D and Type-055 missile destroyers shows a pattern of applying any technological breakthrough on all types of ship, so when production of the Type-054A frigate and Type-052DL destroyer finishes, the Type-054B frigate can be expected to follow the same pattern by having updated equipment installed on a larger-displacement platform. It would be put into mass production to replace the Type-054A frigate, and provide an outer shield for aircraft carriers and amphibious assault ships.
Although the US military has started testing directed-energy weapons, they have not yet been used to equip troops, planes and ships. The Taiwanese navy’s existing battleships have a very limited electric power supply margin, so they could probably not be re-equipped with such power-hungry equipment.
The light frigates that would begin construction in the first half of this year have had to be divided into “air defense” and “anti-ship” types because of their limited tonnage, so there is no room for them to have additional kinds of equipment installed.
Even if the US at some point is willing to supply Taiwan with directed-energy weapons to meet urgent combat readiness needs, there would probably be no suitable platforms on which to install them.
As well as adding laser and high-power microwave weapons to the PLAN’s range of armaments, China has even exported them to Saudi Arabia, where they have been validated.
If used in a war against the attack drones that Taiwan is developing, and the Harpoon and Hsiung Feng II/III anti-ship missiles that Taiwan deploys, it is hard to tell whether these high-power microwave weapons would inhibit Taiwan’s armed forces’ asymmetric warfare capabilities. Nonetheless, the nation must urgently find a way to respond to them.
Lu Li-shih is a doctoral student in Soochow University’s Department of Political Science, and a former captain of the ROCS Hsin Chiang.
Translated by Julian Clegg
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS