In 2004, Buddhist Master Hsing Yun (星雲) wrote a letter to fellow Buddhists during the Lunar New Year, saying that Taiwanese were originally from provinces in China, which means the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are essentially Chinese.
On Jan. 6, I visited Buddhist organization Fo Guang Shan to explain to Hsing Yun the notion that Taiwanese are not Chinese, and I asked Abbot Hui Lun (慧倫) to pass on historical documents, my works and other materials.
The documents I gave Hsing Yun were great in detail and number.
I gave him two simple examples of evidence:
First, page 60 of Volume 3 of Lien Heng’s (連橫) The General History of Taiwan (台灣通史) says that in the 23rd year of Emperor Qianlong’s (乾隆帝) reign — 1758 — Taiwanese were ordered to change their surnames to Han Chinese surnames.
Second, Volume 15 of General History, “The Book of Settlement and Appeasement,” says that “the domesticated savages were gradually assimilated into the Han culture. To fall in line with the national system, they were ordered to shave their heads and were given Han surnames.”
If Taiwanese were from provinces in China, why would they need to change their surnames? This proves that Hsing Yun’s theory that Taiwanese are Chinese is false.
Hui Lun must have passed the information on to Hsing Yun, because on May 13, 2010, when Hsing Yun met with Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), then-chairman of China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits, in Beijing, he said: “Both sides of the Taiwan Strait are Chinese,” but the next day, when he met with Wang Yi (王毅), who was director of China’s Taiwan Affairs Office at the time, he did not make the same statement again.
He only used the word “compatriots,” and did not mention Taiwanese or Chinese.
In Buddhist terms, he must have repented.
The evidence is sufficient to show that it is false for Taiwan’s history textbooks to claim that “Taiwanese are part of an immigrant society from China.”
If Taiwanese were truly Chinese immigrants, they would have already had Han Chinese surnames, and therefore would have had no need to change them.
Sim Kiantek is a former associate professor in the Department of Business Administration at National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Rita Wang
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question:
RSS