Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the pride of the nation, has recently become a villain to residents of Tainan’s Annan District (安南).
In 2017, TSMC announced plans to build the world’s first 3-nanometer fab in Anding District (安定). While the project was once welcomed by residents of Tainan, it has since become a source of controversy.
The new fab requires a huge amount of electricity to operate. To meet TSMC’s surging electricity demand, plans are under way to construct a 1.2 gigawatt gas power station near a residential area in Annan District.
More than 10,000 Annan residents have signed a petition opposing the power plant’s construction.
Locals fear that the power plant will worsen air pollution in the region, which is already severe. In Tainan, average concentrations of toxic PM2.5 pollution — particulate matter smaller than 2.5 micrometers — are already about four times higher than the WHO standard. The planned location of the power plant is within a few kilometers of communities, schools and a hospital.
Moreover, residents are worried about potential gas explosions resulting from the construction of pipelines in the area. Environmentalists have also raised concerns that the site is home to protected species, such as the grass owl.
The case has garnered significant local media attention, but TSMC hides behind the scenes, as if the controversy were unrelated to it. Yet as the planned power plant’s biggest customer, TSMC is central to the story.
TSMC’s failure to stand up for the residents of Annan is merely the latest example of the company’s delayed transition to renewable energy.
Worldwide, TSMC lags behind its competitors when it comes to renewable energy usage. In 2021, renewable energy accounted for just 9 percent of TSMC’s overall electricity consumption, compared with 20 percent for Samsung and 80 percent for Intel.
At the same time, TSMC is working toward its climate commitments at a pace that does not match its role as an industry leader. In 2020, TSMC was the first semiconductor company to join RE100 and targeted 100 percent renewable energy by 2050.
However, in the first year of joining the global initiative, TSMC’s renewable energy ratio increased by only 2 percent. TSMC’s target of 100 percent renewable energy use by 2050 leaves much space for the company to fool around with empty words and false actions.
As a RE100 member, TSMC must stand with residents of Annan and oppose the construction of the planned gas power plant. This case foreshadows many more to come. TSMC’s electricity usage in Taiwan is forecast to increase about threefold between 2020 and 2030.
Taiwan’s renewable energy generation is insufficient to meet rising demand. In addition to purchasing offshore wind energy via corporate power purchase agreements, TSMC must diversify its own renewable energy portfolio, and increase direct investment in renewable energy and self generation, especially in the form of rooftop solar panels on its buildings.
A greater commitment to renewable energy, as well as support for the local community in rejecting the planned power plant, would serve as vital proof of TSMC’s determination regarding energy transition.
Lawmakers on Jan. 9 passed legislation offering tax credits to chipmakers such as TSMC to foster research and investment in advanced technologies. The energy-intensive semiconductor industry is likely to remain the most strategically important sector in Taiwan for years to come.
However, for too long, TSMC and the industry as a whole have hidden behind the government, demanding large amounts of cheap electricity and water.
It is time for TSMC and other manufacturing giants to take greater responsibility for Taiwan’s net zero future and show that they are serious about achieving an energy transition that benefits all of Taiwan, including residents of Annan.
Tracy Cheng is a campaigner in the Greenpeace Taipei Office.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS