Criticisms of corruption, a poorly managed bureaucracy and uninformed, unprincipled or unaccomplished policy in China are often met with harsh punishments. Many protesters in the “blank paper movement,” for example, have been disappeared by the authorities.
Meanwhile, the WHO has asked China to provide data on its COVID-19 situation, with the Chinese government choosing to disseminate propaganda instead.
The first amendment of the US Constitution, written in 1791, prohibits the US government from abridging the freedom of speech, press, assembly, petition, or religion. More than 200 years later, China, the world’s second-largest economy, still lacks the freedoms of speech and the press, among others.
A democratic government of the people, by the people and for the people would listen to people’s complaints, as power originates from people. Freedom of speech is essential to achieve that purpose.
On the contrary, an autocratic government, which derives its power from a dictator, would not hesitate to suppress people’s voices and ignore their concerns.
It has been reported in China that some people who had received three doses of the Sinovac Biotech COVID-19 vaccine have died, while some unvaccinated people have survived COVID-19 infection.
Although there is no statistical data to confirm its scientific merits, the efficacy of one or two doses of the Sinovac vaccine has consistently been shown to be much lower than that of mRNA vaccines in all age groups. Therefore, it is scientifically puzzling that earlier studies have said three doses of the Sinovac vaccine matches the efficacy of mRNA vaccines.
That Sinovac’s inactivated vaccine does not provide effective protection against the Omicron subvariants of SARS-CoV-2 supports the argument that such vaccines might divert the immune system toward multiple targets, compromising its resilience against the mutated virus.
China and the WHO should find out the facts and quickly supplement the vaccines currently on offer in China with mRNA vaccines to save lives.
As former US president Thomas Jefferson said: “Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom.”
Only weak people are afraid of truth. Truth makes people, and consequently a country, strong.
The ills and grievances of a society cannot be treated if truth is not revealed. Journalists serve as the eyes of the public. Without freedom of the press, society can hardly be managed properly, as problems can be swept under the rug and lessons from past mistakes cannot be learned.
Since the beginning of this year, the term “human mine” has been circulating on the Internet among Chinese dissidents. This disturbing word in its darkest meaning has to do with live organ harvesting.
A 15-year-old high-school student named Hu Xinyu (胡鑫宇), carrying the same rare blood type as that of a high-ranking Chinese official, disappeared from his school campus in October last year. Concurrently, a eulogy to retired Chinese official Gao Zhanxiang (?占祥), who recently died of COVID-19, explicitly described how he had had numerous organ transplants. Suspicions have been expressed online how these stories reflect a horrifying picture of the rampant organ harvesting “business” in China.
Laws are the standard operating procedures of a society, which accumulates wisdom from aspirations, ideas and mistakes.
Crimes against humanity must be punished and laws must be enforced to prevent them from happening again. Unfortunately, an autocratic government simply wants to cover them up and pretend “there is no there there.” As a result, several serious human right issues in China have not been properly addressed. Would this be similar to a pressure cooker ready to explode? The truth will come out in the end.
In the meantime, tearing down China’s cyberspace “iron curtain” by using satellite communication or other means has become ever more urgent to save lives, protect human rights and dismantle autocracy. Only truth will set the country free.
James J.Y. Hsu is a retired professor of physics.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS