Just as China’s abrupt “zero COVID-19” policy U-turn presents a risk to international public health, the military drills it has launched around Taiwan show that it continues to pose a threat to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and the region.
After deploying 78 aircraft and ships in the airspace and waters around Taiwan at the end of last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) Eastern Theater Command launched joint combat strike drills on Sunday. Within 24 hours, the PLA had sent 57 warplanes and four ships toward Taiwan, with 28 of the aircraft crossing the median line of the Taiwan Strait.
The PLA issued a statement saying the drills were “aimed at testing the PLA’s combat capability in the face of a series of provocations from external and Taiwan independence forces.”
The drills have been interpreted as a response to the passage of the US’ Fiscal 2023 National Defense Authorization Act, which stipulates military aid to Taiwan and declares Taipei a non-NATO partner. They have also been deemed a warning to new US House of Representatives Speaker Kevin McCarthy not to visit Taiwan, after he vowed to do so.
There is also speculation that the drills were launched in protest of a German parliamentary delegation visiting Taiwan. Beijing previously lodged a complaint after the German government’s policy guidelines mentioned Taiwan for the first time and said Berlin opposes altering the cross-strait “status quo” through non-peaceful means.
China’s military incursions are simply pretexts to prepare for its long-planned invasion of Taiwan and distract attention from domestic issues, including a surge in COVID-19 cases.
Minister of Foreign Affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) last month said that Beijing would keep coming up with new excuses to hold drills as it prepares for an attack on Taiwan, especially after the Chinese Communist Party in October granted Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) a third term in office.
On Monday, while the latest Chinese drills were under way, official delegations from Germany, Lithuania, Paraguay and Tuvalu were in Taipei to show their support for Taiwan’s democracy and prosperity.
Free Democratic Party (FDP) deputy chair Johannes Vogel, the joint leader of the German delegation, said that “Germany would like to send China a message that military intimidation is not acceptable” and that the visit aims to “demonstrate Germany’s massive support for Taiwan.”
Taiwan last year saw a marked increase in the number of visits by foreign delegations, especially after China launched a military drill surrounding Taiwan in August. More than 50 countries have condemned China’s military coercion, and reiterated support for Taiwan’s democracy and maintaining the “status quo.”
The US Congress has passed more than 80 pro-Taiwan resolutions — a record — and European countries and the EU Parliament have proposed 30 resolutions to enhance relations with Taiwan.
Former NATO secretary-general Anders Fogh Rasmussen visited Taiwan last week, calling on European countries to help Taipei deter a possible Chinese attack by conducting joint military exercises.
The US approved eight arms sales packages to Taiwan and Japan in its latest national defense paper, highlighting Taipei as an extremely important geopolitical partner.
Japan is also planning to reorganize the deployment of its defense forces, and build new bomb shelters and an infantry base in Okinawa as it seeks to take a more offensive stance to ensure stability in the Taiwan Strait.
China’s drills that seek to intimidate Taiwan and its partners have backfired, exposing Xi’s lie of “peaceful unification across the Strait” and inspiring greater urgency among democratic allies.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS