The Chinese communist Party’s cruel and abusive Zero-COVID lockdown policy has been a disaster. At home, it has brought incalculable suffering to the Chinese people, while abroad it has made the country a laughingstock to the rest of the world. Since the outbreak of the pandemic, the Chinese people have been compelled to adhere to this draconian policy, conceived and orchestrated by Xi Jinping (習近平). Xi showed no signs of brooking compromises or changing course, despite the calamity he brought to the nation.
However, over the last couple of weeks, we have seen Xi’s resolve shaken by mass protests throughout China. Faced with nationwide outrage, Xi had no alternative but to implement a set of humiliating compromises in the interest of maintaining the stability of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) authoritarian regime. Inexplicably, the Zero-COVID policy that had been in place for the length of the pandemic came tumbling down overnight, with restrictions and regulations suddenly relaxed throughout China.
This is what dictatorships are like: they govern with an iron fist, but with it they also tend to go where the wind blows. They can be ferocious and draconian one day and flip 180 degrees the next if they sense a challenge to their monopoly of power. They care little for consistency and severe consequence of drastic and swift policy swings without adequate preparation, so long as their dictatorship prolongs and prospers.
There is nothing surprising about the failure of Zero-COVID policy. In fact, it mirrors similar CCP policy disasters. It is comparable to two other policy abominations: the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. They might differ in the scale and magnitude of the suffering that they wrought on the people, but their inherent logic, their modus operandi, and their development are remarkably identical.
What the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, and Zero-COVID have in common, is their stupefying hubris. They assume the Party and its supreme leader are so powerful and capable, that with an order they can eradicate all the vermin, pests, sparrows, “revisionists,” and viruses they choose not to like.
The Great Leap Forward was motivated by Mao’s desire to see China surpass Britain and catch up with the US within a short period of time. The Cultural Revolution was to continue the communist revolution by opposing revisionism abroad and preventing it at home. Zero-COVID, for its part, is to reduce infections to zero nationwide. All three lunacies are meant to showcase the Chinese communists’ all-encompassing greatness.
From the outset of the COVID outbreak in Wuhan, Xi has stuck to his plan, which he perceives to be superior to those adopted by advanced industrial democracies. As a result, he has ignored common sense and science, causing immense human suffering. Supremely confident in his approach, Xi sought to position himself and the CCP’s model for pandemic response as a beacon of salvation for the rest of the world. The CCP would lead us all out of the deadly pandemic, garnering praise for Beijing and the Supreme Leader, guiding us ever closer to fulfilling the common destiny of mankind under the CCP’s brilliant leadership.
These dramatic aims appear quite silly as the virus proves to be smarter than the severely under-educated Xi. But the supreme leader however could not admit the failure of his policy, and thus, he made support for Zero-COVID a test of every party member’s loyalty to him, the Party, and ultimately the communist cause. To oppose the Zero-COVID policy is to oppose Xi; to oppose Xi is to oppose the Party; and to oppose the Party is to oppose communism itself.
It is little wonder, then, that senior CCP officials, well aware of Xi’s capacity for ruthless purges, would prostrate themselves before him and keep silent about the absurdity and inhumanity of Zero-COVID. No senior CCP leader has openly uttered any meaningful objection to Xi’s lunacy. The only real opposition has come from outside the Communist Party, from the angry, loud and brave protesters in the streets, in all the major cities and metropolises across the country.
The nationwide protests, unprecedented since 1989, threatened the stability of the CCP’s power. But there is another situation that compelled Xi to make the inevitable compromise: his Zero-COVID lockdowns have ruined the Chinese economy, the world’s second largest.
Like Mao’s Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, Xi’s Zero-COVID policy had brought the Chinese economy to the brink of collapse. Under Zero-COVID, millions of ordinary people lost their jobs and millions of businesses were forced to shut down. Production in China, the world’s factory, came to a shuddering halt. Virtually all the foreign companies operating in Guangdong’s Dongguan City, the world’s largest manufacturing base, including Sanyo, Panasonic, Sony, Nokia, Canon, Epson and Cisco, have fled.
The Zero-COVID lockdowns led to a mass exodus of employees and a shutdown of production at the Foxconn factory in Zhengzhou, which produces 80 percent of the world’s Apple phones, and Apple has been forced to look outside of China for other production bases to expedite its flight from China. With Christmas just around the corner, orders from around the world to the hobbled Chinese factories are down by nearly 40 percent. Within China, November 11th, the biggest consumer day in the country, known as Singles Day in China, saw sales drop by 42 percent.
Investor confidence in Chinese companies has plummeted, causing the stocks of almost all the leading Chinese companies like Alibaba and Tencent to fall at an unprecedented rate. The central, provincial, and local governments have wasted enormous resources building huge concentration camp-style mobile cabin hospitals, Orwellian rapid-testing stations, and all manner of control mechanisms to keep the costly Zero-COVID policy running. Zero-COVID has run the finances of every province in China into the red.
In short, Zero-COVID has shattered the myth of the CCP’s economic miracle. Just like Mao during the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, Xi has managed to once again bring China’s economy to near collapse.
Like Mao’s Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, Xi’s Zero-COVID policy has fostered deep suspicion and distrust of the CCP and of the prudence and competence of China’s leaders, not just in the eyes of the Chinese people, but throughout the world.
Xi had intended to display to the world the glory and superiority of the CCP and China’s socialist system, but this backfired miserably. All Zero-COVID proved in the end was the arrogance, incompetence, stupidity, and cruelty of the communist system, and the protests demonstrated the disappointment, desperation, and anger of the people toward their rulers. When repression deepens, the Chinese people want to flee, en masse.
On Dec. 6, the day after the sudden relaxation of the Zero-COVID policy, the most searched phrase on WeChat by Chinese people was “emigration” (移民), with over 116 million entries. The philosophy of the CCP is the philosophy of “struggle,” while the philosophy of the Chinese people under CCP rule is either the philosophy of “lying flat” (躺平),a pervasive form of passive resistance and disengagement with the CCP, or the philosophy of “RUN” (潤), a phonetic adaptation of the English word “run,” to mean the study of how to flee from China.
Given how flagrantly incompetent and callous the CCP has proven itself, what right does it have to think it can achieve “the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation”?
Miles Yu served as the senior China policy and planning advisor to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo during the Trump Administration.
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises, the largest naval exercise in the region, are aimed at deepening international collaboration and interaction while strengthening tactical capabilities and flexibility in tackling maritime crises. China was invited to participate in RIMPAC in 2014 and 2016, but it was excluded this year. The underlying reason is that Beijing’s ambitions of regional expansion and challenging the international order have raised global concern. The world has made clear its suspicions of China, and its exclusion from RIMPAC this year will bring about a sea change in years to come. The purpose of excluding China is primarily
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the