The UN’s COP27 climate conference ended on Nov. 20 with much emphasis on “loss and damage” funding for vulnerable countries hit hard by climate disasters. Its conclusions are not relevant to the climate priorities of Pacific island nations. It is time for Taiwan to work with its Austronesian brothers and sisters in the Pacific, especially through the Austronesian Forum, in calling for significant global climate action.
The reason COP27’s results are not being welcomed in the Pacific region is because Pacific islanders have realized that sea-level rise threatens supplies of fresh water, agricultural sustainability and infrastructure buildup. In a worst-case scenario, some inhabited islands could sink and disappear. The money for compensating “loss and damage” is not going to help their homes survive accelerating sea-level rise.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in her statement at the end of the COP27 that the conference “has opened a new chapter on financing loss and damage.” This is “crucial moving forward, because there can be no lasting action against climate change without climate justice.” COP27 “marks a small step towards climate justice, but much more is needed for the planet.”
Von der Leyen said that “COP27 has kept alive the goal of 1.5°C. Unfortunately, however, it has not delivered on a commitment by the world’s major emitters to phase down fossil fuels, nor new commitments on climate mitigation.”
Pacific leaders launched the development of the 2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent at the 2019 Pacific Islands Forum and finalized the strategy this summer. They highlighted their concerns for the region’s enduring challenges, which, of course, include climate change-related impacts.
Several climate scenarios were mentioned. For example, by 2050 without new action global greenhouse gas emissions are projected to increase by 50 percent, primarily due to a 70 percent growth in energy-related carbon dioxide emissions. There would be a loss and degradation of land and ocean resources as a result of exceeding 1.5°C warming.
All reefs would be threatened, with more frequent bleaching, lower levels of carbonate and increased cyclonic activity. A 30 percent increase in ocean acidity would affect many ocean — and coastal — species. Sea-level rise is projected to erode coastlines and increase saltwater intrusion.
The Pacific Islands Forum is to be one of the important platforms facilitating the region working together to bring the whole world’s attention to their priorities in climate action.
The Austronesian Forum, which includes Taiwan as a crucial member because many Austronesian people identify with Taiwan’s indigenous cultures, could be a significant platform as well. Taiwan should, through the forum, help its Austronesian brothers and sisters get attention from other parts of the world. While sharing the same goals on climate action, Taiwan can also reaffirm its connections with many Pacific island states.
The government’s commitments to zero carbon policies and Taiwanese enterprises’ realization of the principles of environmental, social and governance goals would help Pacific islanders urge other industrial developed countries to take the same action to tackle the climate crisis together.
In return, teaming up with partners within the Austronesian Forum might extend Taiwan’s climate vision to a global level, and probably open the door for Taiwan to join the UN Climate Change Conference in the near future.
Edward Pingyuan Lu is president of the Guahan Global Foundation and director of HSVG Mission’s Public Health Office.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS