As Taiwan did a good job in curbing the COVID-19 pandemic, most Taiwanese — aside from those were diagnosed with the disease — were free to go to the polling stations on Nov. 26 to vote in the nine-in-one local elections.
In contrast, across the Taiwan Strait, dissatisfaction with the Chinese government’s harsh “zero COVID” policy spawned a “Blank Paper Movement” across the nation. Demonstrators chanted slogans calling for Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to step down. Clamoring for democracy and freedom of speech, some protesters were heard chanting: “Give me liberty, or give me death.”
In Taiwan, these appeals are already the fundamental rights of Taiwanese. If the public is dissatisfied with the government, all it needs to do is to vote the governing party out of office. From the Hong Kong protests to the “Blank Paper” protests on the mainland, it is hard to imagine why any Taiwanese would want to become part of China.
In the run-up to the elections, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) promoted the notion that a vote for the party is to “say no” to war and to extending mandatory military service. Perhaps this is one of the reasons that contributed to the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) defeat.
Some of my friends, who had never voted before, went to the polls this time, bearing in mind former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) claim that “vote for the DPP and our youth will go war.” This will not be the last time we hear this slogan as the nation gears up for the 2024 presidential election.
Since 1949, the CCP has been employing different strategies — from politic to economics, foreign relations and military power — in its bid to annex Taiwan. This is an issue that the KMT, or any political party in Taiwan, must address. Not content with attacking Taiwan’s performance in curbing the COVID-19 pandemic, the opposition resorted to undermining national defense in its desire to the win the elections.
As Chinese philosopher Sun Tzu (孫子) wrote in The Art of War: “The highest form of generalship is to balk the enemy’s plans; the next best is to prevent the junction of the enemy’s forces; the next in order is to attack the enemy’s army in the field; and the worst policy of all is to besiege walled cities.”
Without military prowess, economic power and national defense, Taiwan would not have enough bargaining chips to “balk the enemy’s plans” or even negotiate peace with its enemy.
In the movie Captain Phillips, the mighty US Navy refused to negotiate with the pirates. When the pirates boarded the destroyer, they were immediately arrested. This shows that one can only talk with the enemy when one is powerful enough.
Military service extension should not be equated with war, but as a measure to boost military power, so that Taiwan has enough bargaining chips to deter an invasion. This issue not only concerns the governing party, but all Taiwanese. People should not be confounded by a simple, specious statement like “vote for the DPP and our youth will go to war.”
My generation witnessed the Tiananmen Square Massacre, while young people today have seen the protests in Hong Kong and China.
The election is over, and putting aside all the rhetoric and passion that went with it, Taiwanese still have to face up to the issue of “standing up to China, safeguarding Taiwan.” It is high time for the Taiwanese public to take this issue seriously.
Arthur Chang is a navy reserve lieutenant commander.
Translated by Rita Wang
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Following the BRICS summit held in Kazan, Russia, last month, media outlets circulated familiar narratives about Russia and China’s plans to dethrone the US dollar and build a BRICS-led global order. Each summit brings renewed buzz about a BRICS cross-border payment system designed to replace the SWIFT payment system, allowing members to trade without using US dollars. Articles often highlight the appeal of this concept to BRICS members — bypassing sanctions, reducing US dollar dependence and escaping US influence. They say that, if widely adopted, the US dollar could lose its global currency status. However, none of these articles provide
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
RSS