China’s “zero COVID-19” policy is unscientific, inhumane and autocratic. It has caused great human suffering and economic havoc, and resulted in many unnecessary fatalities. The latest incident was a fire at a high-rise apartment in Urumqi, Xinjiang.
A COVID-19 lockdown prevented the residents from escaping the blaze and the firefighters from reaching them. Local officials say that 10 were killed, including three children, while nine were injured. Many believe the number of casualties is much higher.
Demonstrations erupted throughout China. Students at Beijing’s Tsinghua University held blank sheets of paper to show their disgust with government lies and censorship.
Song Dynasty poet Su Shih (蘇軾) wrote a poem to express that helpless feeling: “No words to ask; only tears in thousands of lines.”
The “Blank Paper Movement” appears to be the biggest nationwide protest in China under the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in recent history.
The “zero COVID-19” policy has been intrusive, thoughtless, reckless and heartless. The majority of college students in China today have known nothing of college life, just COVID-19 lockdowns. Many low-income workers have been unable to feed their families, or care for their old and young. Youth unemployment has reached 20 percent. Worse yet, people have been deprived of freedom. Not surprisingly, protesters chanted: “Give me liberty or give me death.”
The curse for Chinese has been a totalitarian regime. Will this be the magical moment that finally breaks that curse?
Protesters have simple demands: democracy, freedom and for Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the CCP to step down. Clearly, public opinion is turning against the CCP as a legitimate government.
However, the movement is a spontaneous outpouring of emotions that does not have leaders.
Moreover, given that Xi is willing to jail or kill anyone who opposes him, one can expect few political concessions.
Regardless, when historians review these events, the movement might be recognized as the beginning of the end of the CCP, and a social movement of awakening for Chinese to seek liberty and justice, and to secure freedom and democracy, by revolution if necessary. How long it will take is anybody’s guess.
For the sake of humanity, the international community must ensure that Chinese get the help they need. Anyone who orders the shooting of protesters should be immediately prosecuted for crimes against humanity.
The Internet should be maintained to prevent the government from blocking and isolating the protests. Businesses, including Apple, should consider moving out of China as a form of economic sanction against the CCP’s tyrannical actions.
There is no recipe for a revolution to succeed, but nothing can be accomplished without good planning.
An opposition party should be organized to lead the negotiations. While the CCP’s 20th National Congress granted Xi another five-year term, the public has not. Xi should get five years as a transition period, while cities and provinces hold local elections in two years, and national elections in another two.
As American journalist Elmer Davis said: “This nation will remain the land of the free only so long as it is the home of the brave.” Bravery loves company. A lone figure with two banners on a highway overpass in central Beijing on Oct. 13 denounced Xi as a “despotic traitor.” Since then, tens of thousands have chanted the same.
While with “no words to ask; only tears to speak,” the movement in China has made history with its breadth and depth. Let history show that humanity will overpower tyranny.
James J.Y. Hsu is a retired professor of physics.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS