India-Taiwan relations are at their strongest in history. The growing bonhomie between New Delhi and Taipei is a testimony to India’s increasing interests and stakes in Taiwan. Its keenness to engage Taiwan is noticeable.
Early last month, Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs Chen Chern-chyi (陳正祺) visited India, achieving several tangible outcomes. He was in India to participate in the annual deputy ministerial dialogue. He also addressed the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry’s India-Taiwan Industrial Collaboration Summit. His visit was well-received by the Indian government as well as by industry leaders.
“India can be the best production place for us. India’s policy of Make in India is fully in line with my government’s policy. Our companies will rely on horizontal collaborations [with Indian companies],” he said during his visit.
With the COVID-19 pandemic subsiding and Taiwan’s re-opening, economic and people-to-people exchanges between India and Taiwan have resumed.
In October, Indian lawmaker Sujeet Kumar visited Taiwan to participate in the high-level Yushan Forum and the inaugural Taiwan-India Dialogue hosted by the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation and Observer Research Foundation. His visit was the first by an Indian member of parliament to Taiwan in six years.
India-Taiwan relations are undergoing a significant transformation. India’s hardline approach toward, and further deterioration of, relations with China has led India to realize the futility of overlooking engagement with Taiwan, at least in the economic, tech and culture domains.
While India is growing more proactive in embracing the idea of engaging Taiwan, the scope is still narrowly defined. India’s eastward engagement would remain incomplete without truly including and working with Taiwan. There is a need for more openness and transparency from the Indian side.
Engagement with Taiwan is not about China, but about mutual benefit. Taiwan is a key part of India’s ambitions of establishing itself as an alternative supply chain hub, and its investment in India could be a game changer for the flagship initiatives of Indian Prime Minster Narendra Modi’s administration, such as production-linked incentives, “digital India,” “Make in India,” and modified programs for semiconductors and the display fab ecosystem.
Defending Taiwan is critical to ensuring a rules-based liberal order in the Indo-Pacific region. Taiwan is an antithesis to China’s authoritarian model of governance. Taiwanese democracy is applauded in the Indo-Pacific region for its openness and transparency. A free Taiwan is exposing the looming fault lines in China. This makes protecting Taiwan from a potential Chinese invasion more important for key stakeholders in the region.
Despite what Beijing claims, Taiwan is no longer just a sovereignty issue for China, but an important piece in achieving a geopolitical victory in the China-US great power rivalry and defying the Indo-Pacific rules-based order. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), China not only seems insecure, but is also becoming more determined to intimidate Taiwan militarily. This pattern in Chinese territorial behavior is a cause for concern for India and some other fellow democracies.
China’s overtures in the Solomon Islands and wider South Pacific have triggered alarms in neighboring Australia and New Zealand as well. Bereft of any institutional mechanism to deal with China’s hegemonic tactics, countries are realizing the importance of safeguarding a rules-based order.
Rising powers such as India and Japan, and middle powers such as Australia, are increasingly playing a bigger role and acting as responsible stakeholders.
India should be a part of the collective effort to maintain the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait. Taiwan’s participation in the Indo-Pacific region would benefit all stakeholders in the region, economically and strategically. It is vital to accept and acknowledge that Taiwan is not part of the problem, rather a part of the solution. It is China that has used military and economic coercion to change the “status quo.”
India is no stranger to such a tactic by China. Similar behavior meted out to India by China should make it more compelling for India to speak out for Taiwan. Minister of Foreign Affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) rightly pointed out that China’s geostrategic ambitions would not stop with Taiwan, and would go beyond.
There is hardly any doubt that the next target for China’s aggression will be India.
Sana Hashmi is postdoctoral fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
RSS