On the “Teacher” board of Professional Technology Temple (PTT), the nation’s largest online bulletin board system, the director of Taipei Municipal Jianguo High School’s library recently complained that the school had been trying since June to recruit two “supply teachers” to supplement its information technology (IT) department.
To qualify for the job, the teacher-cum-IT-professional would only be required to have a college degree, and would not even need any relevant experience.
There was the added provision that “supply teachers” often become “regular teachers” after two years. Regardless, it took 13 recruiting sessions for the school to find the teachers it needed.
Another comment on the PTT board concerned civil service examinations, asking why there are always so many vacancies every year for the Information Management Center at the New Taipei City Government’s Research, Development and Evaluation Commission. Insiders have said that the problem lies in IT civil servants being caught up chasing their tails.
Since the establishment of the Ministry of Digital Affairs in August, public and media discussion have focused on the so-called “Internet army.”
However, they might not know that the problems in recruiting staff experienced by the high school have long existed in most government agencies.
For the most basic information network operations, most government units outsource their networks to private companies.
If a computer software or hardware problem occurs, civil servants are hard-pressed to solve the problem by themselves, and have to turn to the contractor.
However, before they do so, they have to jump through all kinds of loops, gaining a supervisor’s approval, making sure there is sufficient budget to commission the work, and filling out forms as part of a verification process.
The New Taipei City Library network — including the book borrow and return system for its main library and all of its branches — has been the responsibility of a single civil servant over the past few years.
Although each township office has multiple divisions, they can only have one contract-based IT worker per office, whose salary is only slightly higher than minimum wage.
This is why it is difficult for the public sector to recruit IT talent, and why many of the recruits are either incompetent or look for a new job after working there for a while.
In the case of elementary and high schools, teachers can familiarize themselves with their school’s computer systems themselves, but whenever they encounter a major difficulty or a revision of the administrative system, they have no choice but to rely on external help to handle it, or they need to bring in a contractor to provide computer classes.
As government agencies tout their promotion of “digitization,” their administrative concepts and systems are, in reality, outdated.
They are still unwilling to allocate sufficient funds to cultivate their own hardware and software talent. All they want is to get the best service at the lowest cost.
Such IT and information security problems are well known to those who work within the government. With the establishment of the Ministry of Digital Affairs, is the battle between human and computers coming to an end? I am not so optimistic.
Chang Hsun-ching is a former librarian.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS