A private corporation or institution has the right to grant employees special paid leave to study for a doctoral degree. People might look on in envy, but they have no say in the matter.
However, people are entitled to say a thing or two if the same scenario takes place at a government institution, as it concerns taxpayers’ money.
Legislator Ann Kao (高虹安), the Taiwan People’s Party’s (TPP) candidate for Hsinchu mayor, has been trying to justify her “privilege” and explain why she was given special paid leave at the Institute for Information Industry, which allowed her to spend 574 days on “business trips” within six years to obtain a doctoral degree at the University of Cincinnati.
Her initial defense was that the institute was a private entity. Little did she know that the institute’s president is required to attend interpellation sessions at the legislature when needed. This is enough to show that the institute is not a purely private entity. Despite being a legislator, it seems that Kao has little idea of a legislator’s duties.
It should be investigated why Kao had the privilege of being granted special paid leave to study for a doctorate in the US.
Was it because her supervisors and superiors at the institute were in the dark about her actions, or did they make an exception for her and help cover up her actions?
Former institute president Wu Ruey-beei (吳瑞北) showed his support for Kao. Using Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) as an example, Wu said that Chang in 1988 also moonlighted as TSMC chairman while serving as chairman of the Industrial Technology Research Institute.
Without Chang holding the two positions, there would be no TSMC, Wu said.
Despite speaking up for Kao, Wu evaded questions on whether it is illegal to take special paid leave at the institute to study for a doctoral degree.
Coincidentally, Wu in 2017 published a book that contained an introduction written by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taoyuan mayoral candidate Simon Chang (張善政), who is accused of plagiarizing papers from a NT$57 million (US$1.77 million) research project he undertook for the Council of Agriculture from 2007 to 2009.
It would seem that Wu, Simon Chang and Kao are in a secret circle at the institute.
Further, Kao seems to have connections to Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, whose vice chairman, Jay Lee (李傑), was her doctoral dissertation adviser.
Within his first year at the company, and before being promoted to his current position in July 2019, Lee pulled the strings for Kao to have a job interview with Hon Hai founder Terry Gou (郭台銘).
On April 21, 2018, when Kao was still employed at the institute, she signed an employment contract with Hon Hai. On April 27 that year, Kao’s dissertation was approved. On May 15, she resigned from the institute, and a day later started her new job as director of Hon Hai’s big data center.
Putting in a good word for her, Gou in 2020 had the TPP put her on the list of legislator-at-large nominees. It is apparent that Gou, Lee and Kao are all members of the Hon Hai cult.
It is ironic that Taipei Mayor and TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who rose to power because of his anti-elitist image, would now treat Kao, an elitist flaunting privileges at the institute and Hon Hai, as his right-hand woman.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired associate professor at National Hsinchu University of Education.
Translated by Rita Wang
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS