Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), chairman of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Wednesday last week made controversial comments in a radio interview, saying: “Aren’t all council speakers in northern Taiwan gangsters?” and “Tell me which one isn’t.”
He later said that his comments were “imprecise,” as he was mocking Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) for refusing to nominate a party member with a criminal record as a candidate for county commissioner, despite previously allowing him to run in a council speaker race, which he won.
Among the seven council speakers in northern Taiwan, three have criminal records, one had a prosecution dismissed and three have clean records.
The Taiwan Anti-Corruption and Whistleblower Protection Association on Wednesday released its findings on the criminal records of city or county councilor candidates in this month’s local elections.
Association chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), a former lawmaker, reported that among the 1,677 councilor candidates, 195 — 11.6 percent — have been prosecuted or have criminal records.
The areas with the highest rates are Yunlin County, where 24.6 percent of candidates have been prosecuted or have criminal records, followed by Miaoli County at 20.8 percent, Kinmen County at 18.8 percent, Kaohsiung at 18 percent and Changhua County at 16.3 percent, the data show. Twelve cities and counties have more than 10 percent of councilor candidates with criminal records, and only Penghu County has none.
Broken down by political party membership, the data show that those with criminal records are 14.4 percent KMT, 12.9 percent independent, 9.5 percent Democratic Progressive Party, including one who later quit the party, and 4.7 percent TPP.
The report examined whether local councilor candidates have been criminally prosecuted, have a criminal conviction record or have been blacklisted by the Criminal Investigation Bureau’s Chihping anti-gangster program. It highlighted candidates who have been convicted for contravening the Controlling Guns, Ammunition and Knives Act (槍砲彈藥刀械管制條例) or who have been associated with cases of serious violence, including murder, convicted of corruption at first instance, convicted of abuse of authority of office or other crimes of note.
The association’s Web site has a map that allows people to click on a city or county and see the candidates who have criminal records, along with links to media reports about the convictions and verdicts in the Judicial Yuan’s Law and Regulations Retrieving System.
When the association launched its investigation in late August, it said that of the 885 incumbent local councilors, 136 have criminal records, or 15.37 percent.
After the association released its report on Wednesday, a survey conducted by Yahoo Taiwan on Thursday asked if people were concerned that “195 councilor candidates have criminal records,” garnering more than 6,500 responses as of noon yesterday. Among the respondents, 61.3 percent said they were “very concerned” and 24.9 percent were “concerned,” while 62.1 percent said candidates with criminal records would “definitely” affect their perspective on the parties that nominated them, and 20.9 percent said it would “likely” affect their perspective.
However, most people learn about candidates through the media, with reports focusing on the mayoral candidates in the six special municipalities, so few are aware of the political credentials of councilor candidates, with most having only vague knowledge of their party affiliation.
People must remember that they have the power to decide who represents them in local administrations. Care should be taken to examine candidates’ records.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then