On Double Ten National Day, the Chinese military “joined” the celebration by sending fighter jets into Taiwan’s southwestern air defense identification zone.
The following morning, Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) said that China had exacerbated cross-strait animosity by ordering its warplanes to cross the median line of the Taiwan Strait. To Chiu, the military encroachments have been nothing but provocation.
Whether it is the minister’s remarks or the military situation across the Strait, the threat that Chinese forces pose has remained an issue of national security. Strictly speaking, the moment Chinese military aircraft cross the median line — thereby upending a tacit agreement that the line serves as a border between Taiwan and China — the conflict has escalated to the brink of war.
Although China presumably does not have the ability to mount a “full-scale” invasion of Taiwan before 2027, its military’s repeated crossings and its relentless saber rattling in the waters around Taiwan following large-scale drills in August imply that Beijing is seeking to change the “status quo” across the Strait with every means available, a development Taipei needs to take extra caution in addressing.
Cross-strait tensions have remained high, as military action by definition operates in a dynamic field and defies a static explanation.
Taiwan’s military has adopted the principle of nonaggression and does not cross the median line during drills. When the navy and air force set the perimeters for their exercises, they follow the rule of not transgressing Chinese sovereignty.
Taiwan has abided by international law and has conducted military exercises according to its protocols. In contrast, it was the Chinese military that first crossed the median line and it has since kept sending warplanes into Taiwan’s southwestern air defense identification zone.
Beijing has not only tried to destroy the tacit military understanding between the two nations, it has also expanded military installations in the South China Sea in a similarly ill-intentioned move.
In Chiu’s remarks, he simply laid out the facts about the Chinese military without any sugarcoating.
In the digital age, it is crucial that people learn to filter the barrage of information they face, and improve their understanding and knowledge of military facts.
Ray Song is a doctoral student in Tamkang University’s Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Rita Wang
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself