The nationwide protests in Iran over women’s rights and abuses by the religious morality police have once again shined a light on the country’s ruling clerical class and the seemingly limitless powers of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
The Islamic Republic has a two-tier government. The first tier, ostensibly representing the sovereignty of the people, includes a president who serves as the executive of a highly centralized state, a parliament charged with creating and debating laws, and a judiciary that vets and interprets those laws. The second tier, representing the sovereignty of God, consists of just one man: the supreme leader, or faqih.
The faqih has an absolute monopoly over state power. He appoints the head of the judiciary and can dismiss the president at will. He is the commander-in-chief of the army, and he can veto any law passed by parliament. The office is anachronistic and utterly unique, allowing for the institutionalization of clerical control over all aspects of government.
Illustration: Mountain People
It is also heretical. Far from being the foundation of Shia Islam, as Iran’s clerical regime claims, the concept of the faqih represents neither the historical consensus nor the current majority view of Shia political thought. It is a wholly made-up office, concocted by the man who first claimed the position for himself: former Iranian supreme leader ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.
Shiism, like Christianity, is messianic. Shia doctrine posits that the temporal world and all its imperfections would be swept away by the appearance of a figure known as the mahdi, who would one day rule over the Earth. Until then, all governments are temporary and illegitimate, as any exercise of direct political power would be considered a usurpation of the mahdi’s divine authority. Thus, for most of the past 1,400 years, Shia clergy have refused to interfere in governmental affairs, instead adopting a position of political quietism.
To be sure, Iran’s leading ayatollahs did fight alongside the country’s merchants and young intellectuals to create the first indigenous democratic movement in the Middle East. The Persian Constitutional Revolution of 1906, as it came to be known, resulted in the creation of a progressive constitution guaranteeing basic rights and freedoms for all Persians, an independent parliament (the Persian National Consultative Assembly), free elections and a clear separation of powers.
However, the revolution was short-lived. In 1921, a British-backed military coup established the Pahlavi dynasty in Iran. The constitution was discarded, parliament was defanged and the state reverted to dictatorship.
The Pahlavis brutally suppressed any political activity by the clergy. While a few prominent clerics participated in the country’s second revolution of the century, the so-called Iranian Nationalist Revolution of 1953, it was not until Iran’s third revolution, in 1979, that the clergy left the mosques and entered government.
That development owed everything to Khomeini’s unprecedented interpretation of the mahdi. Countering 14 centuries of Shia doctrine, he argued that, in the absence of the mahdi — the sole legitimate leader of an Islamic state — political power should rest in the hands of the mahdi’s representatives on Earth: the clergy. Put another way, rather than waiting for the mahdi to return at the end of time to create the perfect society, the clergy should be empowered to create the perfect society for him so that he would return at the end of time. Khomeini called this theory the valayat-e faqih, or “the guardianship of the jurist.”
This was an astounding assertion and a radical religious innovation in Shia Islam. Yet Khomeini went even further, saying that political authority should rest not with the whole of the clergy, but with a single “supreme” cleric.
He said that, as the deputy of the mahdi, the supreme cleric’s authority should be identical not just to the mahdi’s, but to that of the Prophet Mohammed himself.
“When a mujtahid [a qualified jurist] who is just and learned stands up for the establishment and organization of the government, he will enjoy all the rights in the affairs of the society that were enjoyed by the prophet,” Khomeini wrote in his political treatise Islamic Government.
No Muslim cleric had ever made so startling a proposal. The notion that any human being could have the same infallible, divine authority as the prophet contradicts centuries of Islamic theology.
The theory was so plainly heretical that it was immediately rejected by almost every other ayatollah in Iran, including Khomeini’s then-superiors, ayatollahs Hossein Kazemeyni Boroujerdi and Mohammad Kazem Shariatmadari, as well as nearly all grand ayatollahs in Najaf, Iraq — the religious center of Shia Islam.
What made Khomeini so alluring was his ability to couch his radical doctrine in the populist rhetoric of the time. Once his colleagues had been intimidated into silence and Iran’s pious masses had been stirred to action, Khomeini was free to seize control of the post-revolutionary government.
Before most Iranians knew what they had accepted, he had injected his interpretation of the mahdi into the political realm, transforming Iran into the Islamic Republic and proclaiming himself the country’s first faqih: the supreme temporal and religious authority.
In 1989, Khomeini died and the office of faqih passed to his hand-picked successor, Khamenei, with little clerical or popular resistance.
Even though the faqih was supposed to be Iran’s most learned religious authority, Khamenei was little more than a mid-level cleric — not even an ayatollah — with thin credentials. Nevertheless, he was given the office largely because practically every other qualified religious authority in Iran — including Khomeini’s first choice as successor, then-grand ayatollah Ali Montazeri — had decried the doctrine of the faqih as anathema to Islam.
Now 83 and in ill health, Khamenei is widely believed to be grooming his eldest son, Mojtaba Khamenei — a cleric of even lower rank than he was when selected — to succeed him as the next supreme leader.
That would strip away any last remnant of religious legitimacy the office still maintains, exposing the faqih for what it is: a synonym for Iranian shah.
Should that happen, the protests that would follow could dwarf the uprisings we are seeing today.
One of the most frequent chants heard on the streets during the current protests has been: “Mojtaba, we’ll see you die before becoming leader.”
Reza Aslan, an Emmy and Peabody Award-nominated producer, is a professor at the University of California, Riverside.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Deterrence is fading; war is looming on the Taiwan Strait and for other targets of the China-enabled dictatorship alliance, and after three years the cure is just dawning on the Biden Administration. Now mind you, for a May 28, 2024 interview with Time magazine, President Joe Biden made his 5th public commitment that the United States would defend Taiwan. Less than three weeks later the United States Navy, along with ships from navies of Japan, Canada, the Netherlands, and France, were conducting the Valiant Shield joint force exercise in the Philippine Sea south of Taiwan and in the South China Sea to
The official media of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) reacted to the May 20 inauguration speech of President William Lai (賴清德) by asserting: “Lai’s words reveal his true intention of sacrificing peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait for his own desire for power.” This baseless accusation by Beijing that Lai is manipulating Taiwanese to resist unification with China for his personal gain, is part of a broader CCP information warfare campaign that has intensified since Lai’s election. This campaign, orchestrated by the United Front Work Department, the CCP’s agency for coordinating influence operations and propaganda, aims to demoralize Taiwanese,
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
A facile way to frame the future of US foreign policy is to set up two scenarios as a binary choice. If former US president Donald Trump returns to the White House, the US becomes isolationist. If US President Joe Biden wins re-election, the US remains broadly internationalist. That framing neglects a change that might be less obvious but more consequential for other countries, a shift that would keep playing out no matter who wins in November: For the first time in its two-and-a-half centuries, the US would stop looking at the world through the lens of its own exceptionalism, and