After Japan broke off diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1972, exchanges between the countries ended. It was only years later, through the efforts of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), that communication between Taipei and Tokyo was rekindled.
The next turning point came in the aftermath of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, when Taiwanese made significant contributions to disaster relief and recovery in Japan.
Then-Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe regarded Lee as a kind of mentor, and the mutual goodwill of the statesmen helped grow the bond between Taiwan and Japan.
Abe’s death has left a political vacuum in Japan, and pro-Taiwan groups especially have found themselves without a political leader. To make matters worse, last year, the pro-China Yoshimasa Hayashi became Japan’s minister of foreign affairs. Hayashi is quite open about his pro-China stance, and treats Taiwan brashly.
On the possibility of a “Taiwan emergency,” Hayashi spoke only of the need to evacuate Japanese citizens, and disregarded the security of Taiwan. When mentioning Vice President William Lai (賴清德), he avoided Lai’s name, referring to him simply as “that person.”
When it was confirmed that Japan would hold a state funeral for Abe, Hayashi instructed the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs to inform President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Lai that they were not invited. In the end, Taiwan sent a three-person delegation, which, after the funeral, was not asked to visit the Akasaka Palace.
These rebuffs not only filled Taiwanese with indignation, they also sowed uncertainty about the future of benevolent exchanges between the nations.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) once vowed that China would never seek regional hegemony, but Beijing’s bellicose behavior has shown otherwise, evidenced by a series of military exercises in the Taiwan Strait in August, launching missiles that landed in the waters of Japan’s exclusive economic zone.
On the 50th anniversary of Japan-China diplomatic relations, Xi exchanged congratulatory messages with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in a telephone call, saying that he attached “great importance” to the relations between their countries, even though, on the same day, Chinese naval ships sailed through the Osumi Strait, accompanied by Russian vessels.
Thus, the Janus-faced China conceals its iron fist in a velvet glove, and not every act of its wickedness is on the record.
Japan and China have a complicated history, with various grudges old and new, and their relations are expected to continue in this vein.
Nevertheless, the countries have much to offer each other. China’s market provides a solution to Japan’s economic woes, and China, besieged by the world because of its behavior, hopes to find a gateway in Japan. This is why Kishida at the UN General Assembly last month only condemned Russia, even though China and Russia are in collusion.
Similar dynamics are apparent in China’s attitude to Japan: At Abe’s state funeral, China did not complain about the presence of the Taiwanese delegation, and accepted that Beijing and Taipei were represented at an international event. It was a show of mutual goodwill between China and Japan, but under the surface the malevolence grows.
The Chinese Communist Party’s 20th National Congress is under way. Should Xi once again secure his position as the highest authority, he would be able to fulfill his political ambition by extending an olive branch to Japan.
Even though Xi is a driver of the hostile Japan-China relationship, the Kishida administration values the economy above defense, and would seize every profit-making opportunity.
A Japan-China relationship as such, top-down and lacking any popular will, is like an upside-down triangle, unstable and liable to topple at any moment.
The friendship between Taiwan and Japan is a bottom-up relationship founded upon popular goodwill. Similar to a pyramid with a solid base, the Taiwan-Japan relationship is built on virtues and good deeds. Even in a raging tempest, it would remain stable and stand tall.
The dynamic in exchanges between Taiwan, Japan and China are set, and any change would come as a result of their citizens.
In the free world, which includes Taiwan and Japan, everything depends on the popular will. The will of the people, like sea currents, is capable of carrying and overturning a boat. The autocrat, without heeding public opinion, would reap what they sow and suffer the consequence of their own doing.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
Tomorrow is the 78th anniversary of the 228 Incident. On Monday, at a meeting with the Overseas 2-28 Survivors Homecoming Group at the Presidential Office, President William Lai (賴清德) spoke of the importance of protecting the nation’s freedom and sovereignty. The 228 Incident is in the past, but the generational trauma exists in the present. The imperative to protect the nation’s sovereignty and liberty from Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aggression will remain for the foreseeable future. The chaos and budget cuts in the legislature threaten the endeavor. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have worked together to