More than 100 professionals, including the incumbent and former presidents of the Taiwanese Society of Psychiatry, have signed a petition calling for politicians to stop making suicide a campaign topic, Chinese-language media reported.
The petition came after separate news reports that a large number of bodies of people who apparently committed suicide had been found in Kaohsiung’s waterways, highlighting the issue, but also potentially triggering copycat attempts.
I log on to the popular gossip board on the Professional Technology Temple (PTT) online academic bulletin board system every day to skim through the headlines. About two to three months ago, I found that “floating corpses in Kaohsiung” was trending.
Searches for “floating corpses” on PTT return 85 results from before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Kaohsiung mayoral candidate Ko Chih-en (柯志恩) posted about the issue on Sept. 16, with 33 of them being about Kaohsiung and 52 about other cities. If floating corpses are a prevalent issue in Taiwan, why is the spotlight on Kaohsiung?
Perhaps it is due to the media’s enthusiastic reporting, Internet users reposting Ko’s post and high click-through rates. The reporting on the issue might have led to more suicides in Kaohsiung, and consequently more suicide victims being found in the city’s waterways.
It shows that increased attention on suicide can exacerbate the problem. The more the public dwells on the subject, the more people might attempt suicide, therefore obliging the Kaohsiung City Government to increase its suicide prevention resources.
However, river banks are long, and there is only so much that a government can do. For decades, Kaohsiung’s suicide rate has ranked first or second among the six special municipalities. Kaohsiung is plagued with several issues, such as an aging population, economically disadvantaged rural areas and middle-age unemployment due to the relocation of pollution and labor-intensive industries. These could be factors in Kaohsiung’s high suicide rate.
However, these discussions are no match for the sensationalizing headlines about “floating corpses.”
The highest overall rate of suicide in Taiwan is among senior citizens. Of the six special municipalities, Taipei has the largest population of senior citizens, followed by Kaohsiung, but there is a large gap between the two cities’ suicide rates.
Senior citizens in the capital in 2015 had an annual income of NT$710,000 on average, which is not too different from the average income of NT$900,000 for those under 65, Taipei City Government data showed. With a vast Mass Rapid Transit system and a high density of hospitals, senior citizens can lead a satisfying and convenient life in Taipei.
Kaohsiung’s air pollution might also be a factor in the high suicide rate. Air pollution with fine particulate matter smaller than 2.5 micrometers can affect the human brain, and there is no academic consensus on its influence on the prevalence of suicide in highly polluted areas.
It might be impossible to stop the media and Internet users from hyping up the issue, but politicians should know better than to add fuel to the fire by discussing suicide methods.
The KMT could instead highlight the economic situation in Kaohsiung, the issue of young people from southern Taiwan relocating to the north as they search for better work opportunities, or the city government’s mental health budget.
It is up to Kaohsiung residents to decide if they have been satisfied with the policies implemented by Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) over the past two years. Nonetheless, people should, above all, lay off the phrase “floating corpses.”
Chen Fong-wei is a psychiatrist.
Translated by Rita Wang
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic