Generation Z has a new solution for workplace burnout: “quiet quitting.” The idea is simple — stop going above and beyond your job description and pay grade.
The trend, which took off on TikTok, sounds ideal. Log off at 5pm. Check. Spend more time with family instead of volunteering for extra tasks? Count me in.
However, the people who tend to experience the highest levels of burnout — women and people of color — probably cannot afford to “quiet quit.”
Women working in the US report experiencing higher rates of job burnout compared with their male counterparts, according to a Gallup poll from last year.
Here is one explanation: From keeping track of colleagues’ birthdays to ensuring the office coffee is stocked, many women are burdened with work that does not advance their careers, said Celeste Headlee, author of Do Nothing: How to Break Away from Overworking, Overdoing and Underliving.
Women of color are even more prone to feeling burnt out, according to Deloitte’s most recent Women at Work survey, and they are less likely to disclose their mental health concerns at work.
On the face of it, “quiet quitting” seems like a logical response — if you are overburdened, why not scale back the work you are doing, especially if it is going unrewarded anyway? The problem is, women and minorities could face greater risks when it comes to advancing in their careers and keeping their jobs by doing so.
A study of retail workers this year found that managers already underestimate women’s potential more than men’s, making them 14 percent less likely to be promoted when compared with their male counterparts. Many black employees feel that they need to work twice as hard due to unfair performance reviews and overdue promotions, and people of color were disproportionately affected by job layoffs at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Quiet quitting” could exacerbate these inequities in the workplace.
Any time a person of color or a woman tries to establish healthy boundaries for themselves, they are much more likely to be seen as troublemakers, Headlee said.
Never mind doing the bare minimum at work. Some research shows that women and minorities face harsher punishments than others for making the same mistakes. So it is not just career growth and workplace relationships that might suffer from “quiet quitting” — being terminated might be a risk, too, if employers see scaling back as shirking your duties.
As a member of Generation Z who entered the workforce in the face of COVID-19, I understand why my generation is now resisting “hustle culture.” We took up side hustles and freelancing to make up for lost opportunities because of the loss of front line jobs during the pandemic. We have been inundated with TikTok videos on how to earn extra cash, and working from home has blurred the boundaries between our jobs and the rest of our lives. “Quiet quitting” is our way of reclaiming energy and power at work.
Perhaps this approach works for some, but for those who want to do less at work without risking backlash, it is worth questioning what is behind your burnout or dissatisfaction. Are you being saddled with non-promotional work? Do you feel that your efforts are going unrecognized? Are you lacking opportunities for advancement? Are you underpaid?
“Quiet quitting” might give you some temporary peace of mind, but it does not make these issues go away.
Instead of silently resisting, it would probably be more helpful to raise these concerns with your boss and brainstorm other solutions. Leaning on mentors and allies, inside and outside of your company, can help you navigate those conversations, and if having an honest discussion about your work-life balance leads to conflict or punishment, that is usually a sign to start searching for another job.
I would like to see more employees advocating for themselves instead of “quiet quitting.” Document instances of overwork — whether it is regularly having to log on after hours, answering calls over the weekend or being assigned more work than you can handle — so you can point to specific instances when talking to your supervisor about boundaries. Ask for support in setting priorities and managing your workload. If you are asking for a promotion or a raise, highlight specific achievements to show how you add value to your team.
“Quiet quitting” sounds like a good idea, but it could hurt your long-term career prospects. For young workers, especially women and minorities, that is a steep price to pay to jump on a trend.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS