As children across Europe and the US start a new school year, the world’s governments are gearing up for their own big education moment. At the UN Transforming Education Summit — from Friday next week to Sept. 19 — they have a chance to tackle a global learning crisis that has been amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic and rising levels of child poverty and malnutrition.
They should start by mobilizing behind an old cause with an urgent new resonance: the provision of free school meals to children who would otherwise be left too hungry to learn.
Pandemic school closures deprived hundreds of millions of children of learning opportunities. Poorer countries closed their classrooms for longer than richer countries, with one to two entire school years lost across much of Africa, South Asia and Latin America. And in rich and poor countries alike, opportunities for remote learning were heavily skewed toward children in wealthier households.
Illustration: Tania Chou
With schools reopening, the scale of the learning losses triggered by school closures is coming fully to light, along with evidence of widening inequalities. Data from poorer countries point to devastating declines from already-abysmal levels.
The World Bank estimates that the share of 10-year-olds who are unable to read a simple story has risen from a pre-pandemic level of 57 percent to more than 70 percent. One recent study in Malawi found that seven months of school closure led to a loss of more than two years’ worth of foundational learning, with children forgetting concepts mastered before lockdown.
Millions of children are now returning to school carrying the triple burden of lost learning, increased poverty and malnutrition. Hunger was rising even before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine added another inflationary twist to the global food crisis. Applying the Food and Agriculture Organization’s regional estimates to Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia suggests that 179 million school-age children were living with hunger last year — an increase of 35 million from 2020. In Africa’s case, almost a quarter of school-age children were suffering undernutrition.
Nor is this crisis restricted to the Global South. In the US, the number of children living in households struggling to put food on the table has increased dramatically over pre-pandemic levels, from 12 million to 18 million. In the UK, the debate about the cost-of-living crisis has focused mostly on energy prices. However, food-price inflation has also squeezed household incomes and left more children hungry. The proportion of children living in food-insecure homes in the UK rose from 12 percent to 17 percent in the first quarter of this year alone, Food Foundation surveys show. As heating bills and food costs rise, the UK is now facing an autumn child hunger crisis.
For poor and rich countries alike, undernutrition now represents a formidable and fast-rising barrier to recovery in learning. As every parent and teacher understands, hungry children struggle to learn. They are more likely to drop out of school, less likely to realize their potential and at greater risk of being trapped in lifelong cycles of deprivation.
There is an antidote, though. Well-designed and properly financed free school-meal programs can protect children against hunger, unlocking the benefits of education. There is overwhelming evidence that school feeding can increase attendance, reduce dropout rates and improve learning outcomes, especially for the poorest children. An evaluation of Ghana’s program found that it increased average learning across the board, with children living in extreme poverty making the greatest gains —– the equivalent of nine months of schooling.
The benefits of effective school-meal programs extend beyond education and across generations. India’s Midday Meal (MDM) scheme — the world’s largest school-feeding program — has raised learning levels, partly by creating incentives to keep girls in education. Recent evidence has shown that girls covered by the MDM also married and had children later, made greater use of health services and had children who were less likely to be stunted.
Before the COVID-19 pandemic, many developing countries were expanding school-meal programs, albeit from a low base. In Africa, where about one-quarter of children were covered by such programs, governments had adopted ambitious plans for expanding access. Unfortunately, many of these plans have now been shelved, as unsustainable debt, slower growth and reduced revenues have shrunk governments’ fiscal space, weakening support for children in a moment of desperate need.
Richer countries were able to use their school-meal programs to protect vulnerable children during the pandemic. For the first time in its 75-year history, the National School Lunch Program in the US was made available to all children without means testing. And in the UK, soccer player Marcus Rashford cajoled a reluctant government into providing meal support during school holidays. Sadly, these concessions are now being diluted or withdrawn even as hunger increases.
What is needed now is a global movement for school meals. At this month’s Transforming Education Summit, governments should commit themselves to the goal of universal provision of free school meals.
For the poorest countries, reaching that goal will require international support. The School Meals Coalition estimates that US$5.8 billion per year will be needed to restore programs disrupted by COVID-19 and to expand provision to an additional 73 million children. The summit provides an opportunity for governments, aid donors, the World Bank and other multilateral development banks to specify how they will fill the financing gaps. They should start by backing former British prime minister Gordon Brown’s proposal for a new education financing facility.
However, this summit must also be for schoolchildren vulnerable to hunger in rich countries. The Children’s Defense Fund has called on US President Joe Biden’s administration to follow California’s example and introduce universal free school meals — an opportunity that it squandered in the new Inflation Reduction Act. In the UK, neither of the candidates to replace Boris Johnson as prime minister mentioned child hunger as a priority, let alone set an agenda for expanding school feeding. That is despite the fact that one-in-three British school-age children living in poverty — 800,000 kids — also lack access to free school meals.
Governments and non-governmental organizations attending the Transforming Education Summit have been encouraged to “reimagine education.” In the absence of clear goals, a viable strategy and a sense of collective purpose, that looks like an invitation to another talking shop.
Attendees can “reimagine” all they want. What children need and have a right to expect is bold practical action and adequate financing to alleviate hunger and make learning possible. Delivering anything less would be a travesty.
Kevin Watkins, a former CEO of Save the Children UK, is a visiting professor at the Firoz Lalji Institute for Africa at the London School of Economics.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s