I was once invited by the New York-based Gheelan Association of USA to give an after-dinner speech. During the dinner, a member asked me what I thought of then-premier Frank Hsieh’s (謝長廷) “constitutional one China” idea.
I replied with my own question: What does “constitutional one China” mean?
This was met with laughter from some of the people around the table. They thought it odd that they possessed a fuller grasp of Taiwanese current affairs than a Taiwanese living in Taiwan.
Many expat Taiwanese entrepreneurs and businesspeople take a deep interest in the future of their mother country and the association is just such an organization.
Hsieh was attempting to break the ice and start a relationship with Beijing.
However, because his proposal of a “constitutional one China” ran contrary to then-president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) policy of “one country on each side” of the Taiwan Strait, it was not long before he was forced to step down.
Many Taiwanese academics have furthered their careers overseas and achieved significant accomplishments in the international academic community.
They take a keen interest in their native land, and many are willing to sacrifice the superior academic environment of the US to return to Taiwan to devote themselves to burnishing Taiwan’s academic credentials.
Nobel Prize-winning chemist Lee Yuan-tseh (李遠哲) is a good example of this. With the prize under his belt, Lee could have stayed in the US to continue his research and lead a comfortable life. Instead, he gave up his US nationality for the sake of his native country and took the role of president of Academia Sinica.
During the 12 years that Lee was at the helm from 1994 to 2006, he persuaded first-rate foreign-born and overseas Taiwanese academics to return to continue their research.
This list includes viral disease specialist and Academia Sinica researcher Michael Lai (賴明詔), Academia Sinica Institute of Physics research fellow Tsong Tien-tzou (鄭天佐), former Academia Sinica vice president Sunney Chan (陳長謙), anthropologist Chang Kwang-chih (張光直) and many others.
Lai has said that the experience of defeating SARS was a key turning point that encouraged him to return to Taiwan.
Today, Taiwan’s approach to defeating COVID-19 has turned it into a model for public health policy in the international scientific community.
Indeed, many Taiwanese academics returned home to help fight the virus.
Over the past three years of the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan’s successes in combating the virus have elevated the nation’s status in the international academic community. Taiwanese scientists such as Lai have made vital contributions to the global pandemic response.
Today, the nation faces challenges and existential threats. Taiwan’s survival depends on the combined efforts of Taiwanese at home and abroad.
Taiwanese who have not lived abroad should thank the selfless actions of the many academics and scientists who returned home to give back to their nation.
Paul Li is a research fellow at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Edward Jones
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS