Taiwan should accelerate setting up detailed regulations for carbon pricing and the creation of a carbon credit exchange to reduce carbon emissions and help local manufacturers cope with the imminent “carbon border tax” levied by the EU.
Taiwan has lagged behind developed countries in implementing policies to cut greenhouse gas emissions. According to a report published by the World Bank in May, 68 countries had carbon pricing initiatives, with 36 levying carbon taxes and 32 having emission trading systems.
Taiwan’s proposed climate change response act (氣候變遷因應法), which would provide key regulations related to reaching the government’s pledge to reduce net carbon emissions to zero by 2050, passed the first reading at the Legislative Yuan in May. The Environmental Protection Administration aims to push through the act during the last legislative session that began this month.
However, the bill lacks substantial content and detailed regulations on carbon pricing or penalties for violations. It stipulates that local companies emitting more than 25,000 tonnes of carbon per year would be required to pay a carbon fee, rather than the commonly adopted carbon tax. It does not clearly say how much those large emitters would have to pay, but fees could range from NT$100 to NT$300 (US$3.26 to US$9.77) per tonne of carbon emitted.
The carbon fee would also not adequately motivate local manufacturers to cut their carbon footprints. The charge is much lower than the carbon tax of more than NT$500 per tonne Singapore intends to levy from 2024. The city-state started collecting carbon taxes in 2019, and in February quadrupled the levy. Local businesses may choose to pay the relatively low carbon fee if there is any.
The carbon fee, to take effect as early as 2024, would initially cover about 287 companies from high-emitting industries such as the steelmaking, semiconductor, cement and petrochemical sectors. Industry leaders such as China Steel Corp, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Formosa Plastics Group would be on the list.
The carbon fee is only a small part of carbon reduction measures implemented by some EU countries, the US, Japan, South Korea, China and Singapore. Other measures usually include carbon trading to help businesses compensate for carbon emissions by funding an equivalent saving of carbon dioxide elsewhere.
Taiwan should set up a carbon credit exchange or trading system to meet growing domestic demand. Local exporters are facing mounting pressure to reduce their carbon footprints to secure orders. Since carbon emissions are included in their customers’ carbon emission reports, businesses with less carbon emissions would have an advantage.
Local businesses need to gear up for the implementation of the carbon border adjustment mechanism by the EU — an import tax designed to corral other countries into tackling climate change.
The carbon border tax could take effect from 2026. About 212 categories worth NT$24.5 billion from Taiwan are expected to be affected by the EU levy.
Since Taiwan does not have a carbon market, businesses are looking overseas. Chimei Corp, which makes polymer materials, synthetic rubbers and specialty chemicals, said it joined Singapore’s global carbon exchange Climate Impact X (CIX) in April and became the first Taiwanese enterprise to complete a carbon credit transaction through the purchase of 10,000 tonnes of carbon credits from the CIX’s Project Marketplace.
As Taiwan’s economy is reliant on exports, government agencies should catch up with the world in setting up a comprehensive carbon emission reduction mechanism that includes carbon fees and carbon trading. This would help local businesses lower costs, secure orders and create new revenue sources by selling carbon savings.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS