Despite the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) early last month starting large military exercises around Taiwan, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) led a delegation to China.
As Hsia hurried to visit the enemy state, was he trying to achieve an urgent “mission” there? Certainly, this tour was not in the hands of the KMT, but made at the mercy of the CCP.
Based on the two parties’ styles and the key members involved, the affair was reminiscent of the 2015 meeting of then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
Before the delegation departed for China on Aug. 10, the KMT did not submit an application for an “urgent” visit to the Mainland Affairs Council until Aug. 4.
SECRET MEETINGS
Similarly, plans for the Nov. 7, 2015, Ma-Xi meeting in Singapore were kept under wraps until the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) ran a report on Nov. 3, forcing the Ma administration to confirm the news.
Had it not been for the reports, the public would have been kept in the dark.
Why did the KMT behave like this before both trips?
Obviously, it knew it would be better to keep its plans quiet, so the government, rival parties and especially the public would not have time to react before the meetings. The Leninist-style behavior of the KMT is just like that of a gangster.
During Hsia’s visit, he first met with Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits President Zhang Zhijun (張志軍), who was China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) minister when the Ma-Xi meeting took place.
Before the Singapore meeting, Hsia, who at that time was the Mainland Affairs Council minister, met with Zhang in Guangzhou, China, in October 2015, when Zhang proposed that Ma and Xi meet, Hsia later said.
Although Hsia did not meet with TAO Minister Liu Jieyi (劉結一) last month, he did meet with TAO Vice Minister Chen Yuanfeng (陳元豐), another major figure at the office in 2015.
RESTORING POWER
When Hsia met with Chen and the Chinese team behind the Ma-Xi meeting, did they discuss the possibility of another private meeting between Ma and Xi?
Among the heavyweights of the KMT, Ma’s political ideology is close to that of Xi’s “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.” There seems to be an urgent need for Xi to meet with Ma to restore his prestige and some of his lost power in China.
The matter might be related to a deleted report about Xi and Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) — titled “Source: Li going up, Xi not going down already a done deal” — allegedly written and released mistakenly by a “translator” at the Chinese-language Economic Daily News on Aug. 22.
By indicating that Xi would definitely not step down, the report was trying to save face for him, to prevent the Chinese president from doing something crazy.
MISDIRECTED FOCUS
Originally, the report was intended to reveal big news from the annual Beidaihe conference in Beijing last month.
Since the report also hinted that former KMT chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) might collude with Xi should a cross-strait war break out, many Taiwanese have focused on Hung, while ignoring the huge political changes taking place in China.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS