Within one month, two major crises in Taiwan’s higher education have been revealed: the severity of student recruitment shortfalls and the declining quality of “in-service master’s programs.”
Student shortages are nothing new, but the shortfall has reached a new high this year. Only 11 universities met their recruitment targets, while 51 universities — 22 public and 29 private — missed their target by 14,000 students, despite reporting a record acceptance rate of 98.94 percent.
The University Admission Committee said that even reputable private universities have been affected by declining enrollments, with Chinese Culture University reporting a considerable shortfall: It only recruited 257 students, despite having 2,635 available spaces.
While the Ministry of Education has drawn up a number of exit plans over the years to address the issue — such as forced closures of private universities whose recruitment rates did not meet the target, or the merging of public universities — they have only addressed low-ranking universities.
The shortfall this year reveals that Taiwan’s low birthrate has left prestigious private and public universities teetering on the brink.
This phenomenon calls for the government to reallocate its resources and funding, while loosening its policies in regards to private universities, and the whole higher education system in due course.
According to the Taiwan Higher Education Union, the government’s spending on tertiary education is only 0.39 percent of GDP, significantly lower than the 1 percent average of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries.
Aside from increasing its budget, the Ministry of Education should provide more resources for private universities, as most students attend them. By providing grants to disadvantaged or low-income students, and incentives for universities to elevate research and teaching quality, the government could ensure the quality of private education does not fall.
The deteriorating quality of “in-service master’s programs” is a correlated issue. While the purpose of the program was to provide people already in employment with an opportunity for further education and growth, the system has become an arena for students, especially politicians, to exchange interests and connections at the university.
Students in the program are usually experts or elites in a certain field, so professors often hope to build connections with them to facilitate upcoming projects or work in the future.
As the programs usually charge exorbitant tuition fees, they have become the golden goose and a source of income to make up for universities’ deficits in undergraduate programs.
As students in the program usually have jobs during weekdays, professors also overlook low attendance rates and turn a blind eye to the poor quality of theses, as can be seen from the recent “thesis gate” scandals — from former Hsinchu mayor Lin Chih-chien (林智堅) to Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Nantou County commissioner candidate Hsu Shu-hua (許淑華).
To address the problem, the ministry should more rigorously regulate the requirements for acquiring master’s degrees, review graduate schools’ enrollment thresholds and the content of their courses for in-service programs.
Higher standards should be established: The number of students a thesis adviser can take should be limited, committee members should be invited to oral defenses, and measures should be taken to ensure the originality and quality of master’s theses.
Higher education is the most critical component to a nation’s development. Rather than leaving universities to sink or swim, it is high time for the government to address these two crises by increasing its budget and reallocating its resources.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS