Within one month, two major crises in Taiwan’s higher education have been revealed: the severity of student recruitment shortfalls and the declining quality of “in-service master’s programs.”
Student shortages are nothing new, but the shortfall has reached a new high this year. Only 11 universities met their recruitment targets, while 51 universities — 22 public and 29 private — missed their target by 14,000 students, despite reporting a record acceptance rate of 98.94 percent.
The University Admission Committee said that even reputable private universities have been affected by declining enrollments, with Chinese Culture University reporting a considerable shortfall: It only recruited 257 students, despite having 2,635 available spaces.
While the Ministry of Education has drawn up a number of exit plans over the years to address the issue — such as forced closures of private universities whose recruitment rates did not meet the target, or the merging of public universities — they have only addressed low-ranking universities.
The shortfall this year reveals that Taiwan’s low birthrate has left prestigious private and public universities teetering on the brink.
This phenomenon calls for the government to reallocate its resources and funding, while loosening its policies in regards to private universities, and the whole higher education system in due course.
According to the Taiwan Higher Education Union, the government’s spending on tertiary education is only 0.39 percent of GDP, significantly lower than the 1 percent average of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries.
Aside from increasing its budget, the Ministry of Education should provide more resources for private universities, as most students attend them. By providing grants to disadvantaged or low-income students, and incentives for universities to elevate research and teaching quality, the government could ensure the quality of private education does not fall.
The deteriorating quality of “in-service master’s programs” is a correlated issue. While the purpose of the program was to provide people already in employment with an opportunity for further education and growth, the system has become an arena for students, especially politicians, to exchange interests and connections at the university.
Students in the program are usually experts or elites in a certain field, so professors often hope to build connections with them to facilitate upcoming projects or work in the future.
As the programs usually charge exorbitant tuition fees, they have become the golden goose and a source of income to make up for universities’ deficits in undergraduate programs.
As students in the program usually have jobs during weekdays, professors also overlook low attendance rates and turn a blind eye to the poor quality of theses, as can be seen from the recent “thesis gate” scandals — from former Hsinchu mayor Lin Chih-chien (林智堅) to Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Nantou County commissioner candidate Hsu Shu-hua (許淑華).
To address the problem, the ministry should more rigorously regulate the requirements for acquiring master’s degrees, review graduate schools’ enrollment thresholds and the content of their courses for in-service programs.
Higher standards should be established: The number of students a thesis adviser can take should be limited, committee members should be invited to oral defenses, and measures should be taken to ensure the originality and quality of master’s theses.
Higher education is the most critical component to a nation’s development. Rather than leaving universities to sink or swim, it is high time for the government to address these two crises by increasing its budget and reallocating its resources.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS